The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A phase I clinical trial with monoclonal antibody ch806 targeting transitional state and mutant epidermal growth factor receptors
Open accessAbstract
An array of cell-surface antigens expressed by human cancers have been identified as targets for antibody-based therapies. The great majority of these antibodies do not have specificity for cancer but recognize antigens expressed on a range of normal cell types (differentiation antigens). Over the past two decades, our group has analyzed thousands of mouse monoclonal antibodies for cancer specificity and identified a battery of antibodies with limited representation on normal human cells. The most tumor-specific of these antibodies is 806, an antibody that detects a unique epitope on the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) that is exposed only on overexpressed, mutant, or ligand-activated forms of the receptor in cancer. In vitro immunohistochemical specificity analysis shows little or no detectable 806 reactivity with normal tissues, even those with high levels of wild-type (wt)EGFR expression. Preclinical studies have demonstrated that 806 specifically targets a subset of EGFR expressed on tumor cells, and has significant anti-tumor effects on human tumor xenografts, primarily through abrogation of signaling pathways. The present clinical study was designed to examine the in vivo specificity of a chimeric form of mAb 806 (ch806) in a tumor targeting/biodistribution/pharmacokinetic analysis in patients with diverse tumor types. ch806 showed excellent targeting of tumor sites in all patients, no evidence of normal tissue uptake, and no significant toxicity. These in vitro and in vivo characteristics of ch806 distinguish it from all other antibodies targeting EGFR.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Malignant astrocytic glioma: genetics, biology, and paths to treatment
Furnari, F. B., Fenton, T., Bachoo, R. M., Mukasa, A., Stommel, J. M., Stegh, A., Hahn, W. C., Ligon, K. L., Louis, D. N., Brennan, C., et al. (2007) · Genes & Development · doi:10.1101/gad.1596707 · Cited by 2,316
Bridging Bio–Nano Science and Cancer Nanomedicine
Björnmalm, M., Thurecht, K. J., Michael, M., Scott, A. M., & Caruso, F. (2017) · ACS Nano · doi:10.1021/acsnano.7b04855 · Cited by 382
Self-citationEGFR family: Structure physiology signalling and therapeutic targets †
Burgess, A. W. (2008) · Growth Factors · doi:10.1080/08977190802312844 · Cited by 288
Self-citationSuh, H. Y., Peck, C., Yu, K.-S., & Lee, H. (2016) · Drug Design, Development and Therapy · doi:10.2147/dddt.s121520 · Cited by 51
Metadata
- Authors
- Scott, A. M., Lee, F.-T., Tebbutt, N., Herbertson, R., Gill, S. S., Liu, Z., Skrinos, E., Murone, C., Saunder, T. H., Chappell, B., Papenfuss, A. T., Poon, A. M. T., Hopkins, W., Smyth, F. E., MacGregor, D., Cher, L. M., Jungbluth, A. A., Ritter, G., Brechbiel, M. W., Murphy, R., Burgess, A. W., Hoffman, E. W., Johns, T. G., & Old, L. J.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2007-03-06
- Volume
- 104
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 4071-4076
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2014362060
- Cited by
- 222
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 8.75
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A phase I clinical trial with monoclonal antibody ch806 targeting transitional state and mutant epidermal growth factor receptors. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.0611693104
- The paper
- Scott, A. M., Lee, F.-T., Tebbutt, N., Herbertson, R., Gill, S. S., Liu, Z., Skrinos, E., Murone, C., Saunder, T. H., Chappell, B., Papenfuss, A. T., Poon, A. M. T., Hopkins, W., Smyth, F. E., MacGregor, D., Cher, L. M., Jungbluth, A. A., Ritter, G., Brechbiel, M. W., . . . Old, L. J. (2007). A phase I clinical trial with monoclonal antibody ch806 targeting transitional state and mutant epidermal growth factor receptors. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0611693104
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.