Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 222

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

A phase I clinical trial with monoclonal antibody ch806 targeting transitional state and mutant epidermal growth factor receptors

Open access
Scott, Andrew M., Lee, Fook-Thean, Tebbutt, Niall, Herbertson, Rebecca, Gill, Sanjeev S., Liu, Zhanqi, Skrinos, Effie, Murone, Carmel, Saunder, Timothy H., Chappell, Bridget, Papenfuss, Anthony T., Poon, Aurora M. T., Hopkins, Wendie, Smyth, Fiona E., MacGregor, Duncan, Cher, Lawrence M., Jungbluth, Achim A., Ritter, Gerd, Brechbiel, Martin W., Murphy, Roger, Burgess, Antony W., Hoffman, Eric W., Johns, Terrance G., Old, Lloyd J.·2007·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

An array of cell-surface antigens expressed by human cancers have been identified as targets for antibody-based therapies. The great majority of these antibodies do not have specificity for cancer but recognize antigens expressed on a range of normal cell types (differentiation antigens). Over the past two decades, our group has analyzed thousands of mouse monoclonal antibodies for cancer specificity and identified a battery of antibodies with limited representation on normal human cells. The most tumor-specific of these antibodies is 806, an antibody that detects a unique epitope on the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) that is exposed only on overexpressed, mutant, or ligand-activated forms of the receptor in cancer. In vitro immunohistochemical specificity analysis shows little or no detectable 806 reactivity with normal tissues, even those with high levels of wild-type (wt)EGFR expression. Preclinical studies have demonstrated that 806 specifically targets a subset of EGFR expressed on tumor cells, and has significant anti-tumor effects on human tumor xenografts, primarily through abrogation of signaling pathways. The present clinical study was designed to examine the in vivo specificity of a chimeric form of mAb 806 (ch806) in a tumor targeting/biodistribution/pharmacokinetic analysis in patients with diverse tumor types. ch806 showed excellent targeting of tumor sites in all patients, no evidence of normal tissue uptake, and no significant toxicity. These in vitro and in vivo characteristics of ch806 distinguish it from all other antibodies targeting EGFR.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.0611693104

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 222

Metadata

Authors
Scott, A. M., Lee, F.-T., Tebbutt, N., Herbertson, R., Gill, S. S., Liu, Z., Skrinos, E., Murone, C., Saunder, T. H., Chappell, B., Papenfuss, A. T., Poon, A. M. T., Hopkins, W., Smyth, F. E., MacGregor, D., Cher, L. M., Jungbluth, A. A., Ritter, G., Brechbiel, M. W., Murphy, R., Burgess, A. W., Hoffman, E. W., Johns, T. G., & Old, L. J.
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2007-03-06
Volume
104
Issue
10
Pages
4071-4076
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2014362060
Cited by
222
References
0
FWCI
8.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A phase I clinical trial with monoclonal antibody ch806 targeting transitional state and mutant epidermal growth factor receptors. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.0611693104
The paper
Scott, A. M., Lee, F.-T., Tebbutt, N., Herbertson, R., Gill, S. S., Liu, Z., Skrinos, E., Murone, C., Saunder, T. H., Chappell, B., Papenfuss, A. T., Poon, A. M. T., Hopkins, W., Smyth, F. E., MacGregor, D., Cher, L. M., Jungbluth, A. A., Ritter, G., Brechbiel, M. W., . . . Old, L. J. (2007). A phase I clinical trial with monoclonal antibody ch806 targeting transitional state and mutant epidermal growth factor receptors. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0611693104

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.