The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Genes duplicated by polyploidy show unequal contributions to the transcriptome and organ-specific reciprocal silencing
Open accessAbstract
Most eukaryotes have genomes that exhibit high levels of gene redundancy, much of which seems to have arisen from one or more cycles of genome doubling. Polyploidy has been particularly prominent during flowering plant evolution, yielding duplicated genes (homoeologs) whose expression may be retained or lost either as an immediate consequence of polyploidization or on an evolutionary timescale. Expression of 40 homoeologous gene pairs was assayed by cDNA-single-stranded conformation polymorphism in natural (1- to 2-million-yr-old) and synthetic tetraploid cotton ( Gossypium ) to determine whether homoeologous gene pairs are expressed at equal levels after polyploid formation. Silencing or unequal expression of one homoeolog was documented for 10 of 40 genes examined in ovules of Gossypium hirsutum. Assays of homoeolog expression in 10 organs revealed variable expression levels and silencing, depending on the gene and organ examined. Remarkably, silencing and biased expression of some gene pairs are reciprocal and developmentally regulated, with one homoeolog showing silencing in some organs and the other being silenced in other organs, suggesting rapid subfunctionalization. Duplicate gene expression was examined in additional natural polyploids to characterize the pace at which expression alteration evolves. Analysis of a synthetic tetraploid revealed homoeolog expression and silencing patterns that sometimes mirrored those of the natural tetraploid. Both long-term and immediate responses to polyploidization were implicated. Data suggest that some silencing events are epigenetically induced during the allopolyploidization process.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Extensive genomic duplication during early chordate evolution
McLysaght, A., Hokamp, K., & Wolfe, K. H. (2002) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng884 · Cited by 530
Gu, X., Wang, Y., & Gu, J. (2002) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng902 · Cited by 257
Cited by
A chromosome-based draft sequence of the hexaploid bread wheat ( Triticum aestivum ) genome
The International Wheat Genome Sequencing Consortium (IWGSC), Mayer, K. F. X., Rogers, J., Doležel, J., Pozniak, C., Eversole, K., Feuillet, C., Gill, B., Friebe, B., Lukaszewski, A. J., et al. (2014) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1251788 · Cited by 1,583
Gene duplication and evolutionary novelty in plants
Flagel, L. E., & Wendel, J. F. (2009) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1111/j.1469-8137.2009.02923.x · Cited by 969
Self-citationYang, J., Liu, D., Wang, X., Ji, C., Cheng, F., Liu, B., Hu, Z., Chen, S., Pental, D., Ju, Y., et al. (2016) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng.3657 · Cited by 580
Genomic changes in synthetic Arabidopsis polyploids
Madlung, A., Tyagi, A. P., Watson, B., Jiang, H., Kagochi, T., Doerge, R. W., Martienssen, R., & Comai, L. (2005) · The Plant Journal · doi:10.1111/j.1365-313x.2004.02297.x · Cited by 349
Novel patterns of gene expression in polyploid plants
ADAMS, K., & WENDEL, J. (2005) · Trends in Genetics · doi:10.1016/j.tig.2005.07.009 · Cited by 342
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Adams, K. L., Cronn, R., Percifield, R., & Wendel, J. F.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2003-03-28
- Volume
- 100
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 4649-4654
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W1972429283
- Cited by
- 825
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 55.83
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Genes duplicated by polyploidy show unequal contributions to the transcriptome and organ-specific reciprocal silencing. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.0630618100
- The paper
- Adams, K. L., Cronn, R., Percifield, R., & Wendel, J. F. (2003). Genes duplicated by polyploidy show unequal contributions to the transcriptome and organ-specific reciprocal silencing. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0630618100
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.