Cited by 314Bone and Dental Protein Studiesdental development and anomaliesEvolution and Paleontology Studies

Mineralized tissue and vertebrate evolution: The secretory calcium-binding phosphoprotein gene cluster

Open access
Kawasaki, Kazuhiko, Weiss, Kenneth M.·2003·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Gene duplication creates evolutionary novelties by using older tools in new ways. We have identified evidence that the genes for enamel matrix proteins (EMPs), milk caseins, and salivary proteins comprise a family descended from a common ancestor by tandem gene duplication. These genes remain linked, except for one EMP gene, amelogenin. These genes show common structural features and are expressed in ontogenetically similar tissues. Many of these genes encode secretory Ca-binding phosphoproteins, which regulate the Ca-phosphate concentration of the extracellular environment. By exploiting this fundamental property, these genes have subsequently diversified to serve specialized adaptive functions. Casein makes milk supersaturated with Ca-phosphate, which was critical to the successive mammalian divergence. The innovation of enamel led to mineralized feeding apparatus, which enabled active predation of early vertebrates. The EMP genes comprise a subfamily not identified previously. A set of genes for dentine and bone extracellular matrix proteins constitutes an additional cluster distal to the EMP gene cluster, with similar structural features to EMP genes. The duplication and diversification of the primordial genes for enamel/dentine/bone extracellular matrix may have been important in core vertebrate feeding adaptations, the mineralized skeleton, the evolution of saliva, and, eventually, lactation. The order of duplication events may help delineate early events in mineralized skeletal formation, which is a major characteristic of vertebrates.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.0638023100

Cites

68 of 68 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • All of these genes originate from tandem duplications of a common ancestor and are located in clusters on human chromosome 4.

    “All of these genes originate from tandem duplications of a common ancestor and are located in clusters on human chromosome 4 [99].”

    From Origin and Evolution of Genes in Eukaryotes: Mechanisms, Dynamics, and Functional Implications (2025) · cites this paper as [99]

    The Abstract says the enamel matrix, casein, and salivary protein genes descended from a common ancestor by tandem duplication. The Results locate a cluster on human chromosome 4q13 and a dentine/bone gene cluster on 4q21, but also place amelogenin (AMEL) on the X and Y chromosomes. Thus, the claim's assertion that all the genes are clustered on chromosome 4 omits an explicit exception. (LLM, conf=0.91)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Mammalian casein genes are thought to have originally arisen by duplication of either enamelin or ameloblastin.

    “Mammalian casein genes are thought to have originally arisen by duplication of either enamelin or ameloblastin 44 , both of which are tooth enamel matrix protein genes that are located adjacent to the casein gene cluster in eutherians and, we find, also in platypus.”

    From Genome analysis of the platypus reveals unique signatures of evolution (2008) · cites this paper as [44]

    The Results (page not specified) conclude that the ancestral calcium-sensitive casein gene probably derived from enamelin or ameloblastin, and the Discussion repeats that proposed origin. The claim says mammalian casein genes generally; the paper does not establish that origin for calcium-insensitive κ-casein. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Caseins belong to the SCPP family, which also includes enamel proteins such as amelogenin (AMEL), ameloblastin (AMBN), and enamelin (ENAM).

    “Caseins belong to the SCPP (secretory calcium-binding phosphoprotein) family, which also includes enamel proteins such as amelogenin (AMEL), ameloblastin (AMBN), and enamelin (ENAM).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 14

  1. [2]Zeichner-David M, Diekwisch T, Fincham A, Lau E, MacDougall M, Moradian-Oldak J, Simmer J, Snead M, Slavkin H C. Int J Dev Biol. 1995;39:69–92. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. [6]Farrell H M, Jr, Thompson M P. In: Calcium-Binding Proteins. Thompson M P, editor. II. Boca Raton, FL: CRC; 1988. pp. 117–137. [Google Scholar]
  3. [8]Rosen J M. In: The Mammary Gland. Neville M C, Daniel C W, editors. New York: Plenum; 1987. pp. 301–322. [Google Scholar]
  4. [25]Salido E C, Yen P H, Koprivnikar K, Yu L C, Shapiro L J. Am J Hum Genet. 1992;50:303–316. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. [32]Salih E, Huang J C, Strawich E, Gouverneur M, Glimcher M J. Connect Tissue Res. 1998;38:241–246. doi: 10.3109/03008209809017041. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  6. [34]Jones W K, Yu-Lee L Y, Clift S M, Brown T L, Rosen J M. J Biol Chem. 1985;260:7042–7050. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. [48]Blackburn D G. Mamm Rev. 1989;19:1–26. [Google Scholar]
  8. [49]Pond C M. Evolution (Lawrence, Kans) 1976;31:177–199. [Google Scholar]
  9. [52]Brew K, Vanaman T C, Hill R L. J Biol Chem. 1967;242:3747–3749. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. [56]Sansom I J. Zool J Linn Soc. 1996;118:47–57. [Google Scholar]
  11. [57]Smith M M, Sansom I J, Smith M P. Modern Geology. 1996;20:303–319. [Google Scholar]
  12. [58]Donoghue P C J, Aldridge R J. In: Major Events in Vertebrate Evolution. Ahlberg P E, editor. London: Taylor & Francis; 2001. pp. 85–105. [Google Scholar]
  13. [59]Forey P, Janvier P. Nature. 1993;361:129–134. [Google Scholar]
  14. [65]Schaeffer B. In: Problems in Vertebrate Evolution. Andrews S M, Miles R S, Walker A D, editors. London: Academic; 1977. pp. 25–52. [Google Scholar]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kawasaki, K., & Weiss, K. M.
Affiliations
Pennsylvania State University (US)
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2003-03-19
Volume
100
Issue
7
Pages
4060-4065
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2099245827
Cited by
314
References
68
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 22 · 2012: 14
FWCI
8.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rheumatology › Bone and Dental Protein Studies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › dental development and anomalies
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Evolution and Paleontology Studies
Keywords
enamel matrix proteins, gene duplication, tandem gene duplication, amelogenin, milk casein, salivary proteins, extracellular matrix proteins, dentin, bone matrix, vertebrate evolution, feeding adaptation
MeSH terms
Animals, Bone Development, Calcium-Binding Proteins, Dental Enamel, Female, Multigene Family, Humans, Milk, Phosphoproteins, Phylogeny, Saliva, Vertebrates, Extracellular Matrix Proteins, Evolution, Molecular

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review