The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Reburn severity in managed and unmanaged vegetation in a large wildfire
Open accessAbstract
Debate over the influence of postwildfire management on future fire severity is occurring in the absence of empirical studies. We used satellite data, government agency records, and aerial photography to examine a forest landscape in southwest Oregon that burned in 1987 and then was subject, in part, to salvage-logging and conifer planting before it reburned during the 2002 Biscuit Fire. Areas that burned severely in 1987 tended to reburn at high severity in 2002, after controlling for the influence of several topographical and biophysical covariates. Areas unaffected by the initial fire tended to burn at the lowest severities in 2002. Areas that were salvage-logged and planted after the initial fire burned more severely than comparable unmanaged areas, suggesting that fuel conditions in conifer plantations can increase fire severity despite removal of large woody fuels.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Model selection and multimodel inference: a practical information-theoretic approach.
Guthery, F. S., Burnham, K. P., & Anderson, D. R. (2003) · The Journal of Wildlife Management · doi:10.2307/3802723 · Cited by 41,495
Warming and earlier spring increase western U.S. forest wildfire activity.
Westerling, A. L., Hidalgo, H. G., Cayan, D. R., & Swetnam, T. W. (2006) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1128834 · Cited by 5,176
Taylor, A. H., & Skinner, C. N. (2003) · Ecological Applications · doi:10.1890/1051-0761(2003)013[0704:spacoh]2.0.co;2 · Cited by 377
Stand- and landscape-level effects of prescribed burning on two Arizona wildfires
Finney, M. A., McHugh, C. W., & Grenfell, I. C. (2005) · Canadian Journal of Forest Research · doi:10.1139/x05-090 · Cited by 230
Stephens, S. L., & Moghaddas, J. J. (2005) · Biological Conservation · doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2005.04.007 · Cited by 96
Cited by
Global and Regional Trends and Drivers of Fire Under Climate Change
Jones, M. W., Abatzoglou, J. T., Veraverbeke, S., Andela, N., Lasslop, G., Forkel, M., Smith, A. J. P., Burton, C., Betts, R. A., van der Werf, G. R., et al. (2022) · Reviews of Geophysics · doi:10.1029/2020rg000726 · Cited by 1,332
The forgotten stage of forest succession: early‐successional ecosystems on forest sites
Swanson, M. E., Franklin, J. F., Beschta, R. L., Crisafulli, C. M., DellaSala, D. A., Hutto, R. L., Lindenmayer, D. B., & Swanson, F. J. (2011) · Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment · doi:10.1890/090157 · Cited by 1,013
A checklist for ecological management of landscapes for conservation
Lindenmayer, D., Hobbs, R. J., Montague‐Drake, R., Alexandra, J., Bennett, A., Burgman, M., Cale, P., Calhoun, A., Cramer, V., Cullen, P., et al. (2008) · Ecology Letters · doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2007.01114.x · Cited by 746
Halofsky, J. E., Peterson, D. L., & Harvey, B. J. (2020) · Fire Ecology · doi:10.1186/s42408-019-0062-8 · Cited by 640
A New Metric for Quantifying Burn Severity: The Relativized Burn Ratio
Parks, S., Dillon, G., & Miller, C. (2014) · Remote Sensing · doi:10.3390/rs6031827 · Cited by 448
Metadata
- Authors
- Thompson, J. R., Spies, T. A., & Ganio, L. M.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2007-06-19
- Volume
- 104
- Issue
- 25
- Pages
- 10743-10748
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2149402324
- Cited by
- 291
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 12.95
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Reburn severity in managed and unmanaged vegetation in a large wildfire. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.0700229104
- The paper
- Thompson, J. R., Spies, T. A., & Ganio, L. M. (2007). Reburn severity in managed and unmanaged vegetation in a large wildfire. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0700229104
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
