Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 211

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Analysis of PALB2/FANCN-associated breast cancer families

Open access
Tischkowitz, Marc, Xia, Bing, Sabbaghian, Nelly, Reis-Filho, Jorge S., Hamel, Nancy, Li, Guilan, van Beers, Erik H., Li, Lili, Khalil, Tayma, Quenneville, Louise A., Omeroglu, Atilla, Poll, Aletta, Lepage, Pierre, Wong, Nora, Nederlof, Petra M., Ashworth, Alan, Tonin, Patricia N., Narod, Steven A., Livingston, David M., Foulkes, William D.·2007·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

No more than ≈30% of hereditary breast cancer has been accounted for by mutations in known genes. Most of these genes, such as BRCA1,BRCA2,TP53,CHEK2,ATM, and FANCJ/BRIP1, function in DNA repair, raising the possibility that germ line mutations in other genes that contribute to this process also predispose to breast cancer. Given its close relationship with BRCA2,PALB2 was sequenced in affected probands from 68 BRCA1/BRCA2-negative breast cancer families of Ashkenazi Jewish, French Canadian, or mixed ethnic descent. The average BRCAPRO score was 0.58. A truncating mutation (229delT) was identified in one family with a strong history of breast cancer (seven breast cancers in three female mutation carriers). This mutation and its associated breast cancers were characterized with another recently reported but unstudied mutation (2521delA) that is also associated with a strong family history of breast cancer. There was no loss of heterozygosity in tumors with either mutation. Moreover, comparative genomic hybridization analysis showed major similarities to that of BRCA2 tumors but with some notable differences, especially loss of 18q, a change that was previously unknown in BRCA2 tumors and less common in sporadic breast cancer. This study supports recent observations that PALB2 mutations are present, albeit not frequently, in breast cancer families. The apparently high penetrance noted in this study suggests that at least some PALB2 mutations are associated with a substantially increased risk for the disease.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.0701724104

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Cited by

See all 211

Metadata

Authors
Tischkowitz, M., Xia, B., Sabbaghian, N., Reis-Filho, J. S., Hamel, N., Li, G., van Beers, E. H., Li, L., Khalil, T., Quenneville, L. A., Omeroglu, A., Poll, A., Lepage, P., Wong, N., Nederlof, P. M., Ashworth, A., Tonin, P. N., Narod, S. A., Livingston, D. M., & Foulkes, W. D.
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2007-04-17
Volume
104
Issue
16
Pages
6788-6793
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W1976388216
Cited by
211
References
3
FWCI
13.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Analysis of PALB2/FANCN-associated breast cancer families. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.0701724104
The paper
Tischkowitz, M., Xia, B., Sabbaghian, N., Reis-Filho, J. S., Hamel, N., Li, G., van Beers, E. H., Li, L., Khalil, T., Quenneville, L. A., Omeroglu, A., Poll, A., Lepage, P., Wong, N., Nederlof, P. M., Ashworth, A., Tonin, P. N., Narod, S. A., Livingston, D. M., & Foulkes, W. D. (2007). Analysis of PALB2/FANCN-associated breast cancer families. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0701724104

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.