Cited by 251

Invasive range expansion by the Humboldt squid, Dosidicus gigas , in the eastern North Pacific

Zeidberg, Louis D., Robison, Bruce H.·2007·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

A unique 16-year time series of deep video surveys in Monterey Bay reveals that the Humboldt squid, Dosidicus gigas , has substantially expanded its perennial geographic range in the eastern North Pacific by invading the waters off central California. This sustained range expansion coincides with changes in climate-linked oceanographic conditions and a reduction in competing top predators. It is also coincident with a decline in the abundance of Pacific hake, the most important commercial groundfish species off western North America. Recognizing the interactive effects of multiple changes in the environment is an issue of growing concern in ocean conservation and sustainability research.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.0702043104

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In pelagic habitats that have been overfished for predatory fish (tuna, sharks), the large Humboldt squid Dosidicus gigas becomes more abundant and appears to adopt the role of the large gnathostomes.

    “One observation from Recent ecosystems is that, for example, in pelagic habitats that have been overfished for predatory fish (tuna, sharks), the large Humboldt squid Dosidicus gigas becomes more abundant and appears to adopt the role of the large gnathostomes (Zeidberg & Robinson 2007).”

    From Palaeozoic evolution of animal mouthparts (2017) · cites this paper as Zeidberg & Robinson 2007

    The Discussion (page unavailable) says tuna and billfish populations have declined, that squid are replacing large fishes, and that predator removal may promote Dosidicus growth and range expansion. It does not establish that overfishing caused the decline or that shark populations were depleted; its proposed link between predator removal and squid growth remains qualified. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Field JC, Baltz K, Phillips AJ, Walker WA (2007) Calif Coop Oceanic Fish Invest Rep 48, in press.
  2. Mackas DL, Keiser R, Saunders M, Yelland DR, Brown RM, Moore D (1997) Can J Fish Aquat Sci 54:2080-2096.
  3. Cosgrove JA (2005) PICES Press 13:30-31.
  4. Wing BL (2006) PICES Press 14:26-28.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zeidberg, L. D., & Robison, B. H.
Affiliations
Monterey Bay Aquarium Research Institute, 7700 Sandholdt Road, Moss Landing, CA 95039
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2007-07-31
Volume
104
Issue
31
Pages
12948-12950
ISSN
  • 0027-8424
  • 1091-6490
Cited by
251
References
1
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review