The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Zebrafish model for human long QT syndrome
Open accessAbstract
Long QT syndrome (LQTS) is a disorder of ventricular repolarization that predisposes affected individuals to lethal cardiac arrhythmias. To date, an appropriate animal model of inherited LQTS does not exist. The zebrafish is a powerful vertebrate model used to dissect molecular pathways of cardiovascular development and disease. Because fundamental electrical properties of the zebrafish heart are remarkably similar to those of the human heart, the zebrafish may be an appropriate model for studying human inherited arrhythmias. Here we describe the molecular, cellular, and electrophysiological basis of a zebrafish mutant characterized by ventricular asystole. Genetic mapping and direct sequencing identify the affected gene as kcnh2 , which encodes the channel responsible for the rapidly activating delayed rectifier K + current ( I Kr ). We show that complete loss of functional I Kr in embryonic hearts leads to ventricular cell membrane depolarization, inability to generate action potentials (APs), and disrupted calcium release. A small hyperpolarizing current restores spontaneous APs, implying wild-type function of other ionic currents critical for AP generation. Heterozygous fish manifest overt cellular and electrocardiographic evidence for delayed ventricular repolarization. Our findings provide insight into the pathogenesis of homozygous kcnh2 mutations and expand the use of zebrafish mutants as a model system to study human arrhythmias.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Studying cardiac arrhythmias in the mouse—a reasonable model for probing mechanisms?
Nerbonne, J. (2004) · Trends in Cardiovascular Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.tcm.2003.12.006 · Cited by 175
Cited by
Selective plane illumination microscopy techniques in developmental biology
Huisken, J., & Stainier, D. Y. R. (2009) · Development · doi:10.1242/dev.022426 · Cited by 608
Self-citationReal-time volumetric microscopy of in vivo dynamics and large-scale samples with SCAPE 2.0
Voleti, V., Patel, K. B., Li, W., Perez Campos, C., Bharadwaj, S., Yu, H., Ford, C., Casper, M. J., Yan, R. W., Liang, W., et al. (2019) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/s41592-019-0579-4 · Cited by 320
Metadata
- Authors
- Arnaout, R., Ferrer, T., Huisken, J., Spitzer, K., Stainier, D. Y. R., Tristani-Firouzi, M., & Chi, N. C.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2007-07-03
- Volume
- 104
- Issue
- 27
- Pages
- 11316-11321
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2013048291
- Cited by
- 238
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 9.07
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Zebrafish model for human long QT syndrome. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.0702724104
- The paper
- Arnaout, R., Ferrer, T., Huisken, J., Spitzer, K., Stainier, D. Y. R., Tristani-Firouzi, M., & Chi, N. C. (2007). Zebrafish model for human long QT syndrome. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0702724104
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.