The digestive adaptation of flying vertebrates: High intestinal paracellular absorption compensates for smaller guts
Open accessAbstract
Anecdotal evidence suggests that birds have smaller intestines than mammals. In the present analysis, we show that small birds and bats have significantly shorter small intestines and less small intestine nominal (smooth bore tube) surface area than similarly sized nonflying mammals. The corresponding >50% reduction in intestinal volume and hence mass of digesta carried is advantageous because the energetic costs of flight increase with load carried. But, a central dilemma is how birds and bats satisfy relatively high energy needs with less absorptive surface area. Here, we further show that an enhanced paracellular pathway for intestinal absorption of water-soluble nutrients such as glucose and amino acids may compensate for reduced small intestines in volant vertebrates. The evidence is that l -rhamnose and other similarly sized, metabolically inert, nonactively transported monosaccharides are absorbed significantly more in small birds and bats than in nonflying mammals. To broaden our comparison and test the veracity of our finding we surveyed the literature for other similar studies of paracellular absorption. The patterns found in our focal species held up when we included other species surveyed in our analysis. Significantly greater amplification of digestive surface area by villi in small birds, also uncovered by our analysis, may provide one mechanistic explanation for the observation of higher paracellular absorption relative to nonflying mammals. It appears that reduced intestinal size and relatively enhanced intestinal paracellular absorption can be added to the suite of adaptations that have evolved in actively flying vertebrates.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Increased paracellular absorption compared to other mammals compensates for shorter intestines.
“Additionally, increased paracellular absorption compared to other mammals compensates for shorter intestines [22].”
From Mammalian intestinal allometry, phylogeny, trophic level and climate (2021) · cites this paper as [22]
The Results and Discussion report higher paracellular absorption in small birds and bats than in nonflying mammals. The paper also finds shorter small intestines in those flying vertebrates, but describes compensation as a hypothesis consistent with the data, rather than an established effect. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredVolant mammals had shorter total intestines than terrestrial mammals.
“Similar to previous findings, volant mammals had shorter total intestines than terrestrial mammals [15, 21, 22]”
From Mammalian intestinal allometry, phylogeny, trophic level and climate (2021) · cites this paper as [22]
The Results and Discussion report that bats had significantly shorter intestines than comparably sized nonflying mammals. The paper specifies its finding as shorter small intestines, however, and does not establish that bats had shorter total intestinal length. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredSpecial adaptations to a volant lifestyle are thought to influence GIT anatomy.
“Other factors than diet thought to influence GIT anatomy include special adaptations to a volant [15, 21, 22] or a marine [23-25] lifestyle, or the aridity of the habitat [16, 26, 27].”
From Mammalian intestinal allometry, phylogeny, trophic level and climate (2021) · cites this paper as [22]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Phylogenies and the Comparative Method
Felsenstein, J. (1985) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/284325 · Cited by 9,793 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 6
- [24]Lavin SR (2007) PhD thesis (University of Wisconsin, Madison).
- [27]Teeling EC, Springer MS, Madsen O, Bates P, O'Brien SJ, Murphy WJ (2005) Science 307:580-584.
- [47]Riviere JE (1999) Comparative Pharmacokinetics: Principles, Techniques and Applications (Iowa State Univ Press, Ames).
- [56]Caviedes-Vidal E, Karasov WH, Chediack JG, Fasulo V, Cruz-Neto AP, Otani L (2007) PLoS , in press.
- [79]Brunetto AL, Pearson ADJ, Gibson R, Bateman DN, Rashid MU (1990) Eur J Clin Invest 20:279-284.
- [81]Fleming SC, Kynaston JA, Laker MF, Pearson ADJ, Kapembwa MS, Griffin GE (1993) J Chromatogr 640:293-297.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Mammalian intestinal allometry, phylogeny, trophic level and climate
Duque-Correa, M. J., Codron, D., Meloro, C., McGrosky, A., Schiffmann, C., Edwards, M. S., & Clauss, M. (2021) · Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspb.2020.2888 · Cited by 40 · see citing works
- Authors
- Caviedes-Vidal, E., McWhorter, T. J., Lavin, S. R., Chediack, J. G., Tracy, C. R., & Karasov, W. H.
- Affiliations
- *Laboratorio de Biología “Prof. E. Caviedes Codelia,” Facultad de Ciencias Humanas, and Departamento de Bioquímica y Ciencias Biológicas, Universidad Nacional de San Luís–Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas, 5700 San Luis, Argentina;
- University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
- Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (AR)
- Ben-Gurion University of the Negev (IL)
- Corresponding author
- McWhorter, Todd J.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Publisher
- National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2007-11-27
- Volume
- 104
- Issue
- 48
- Pages
- 19132-19137
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- PMC
- PMC2141920
- OpenAlex
- W2142487553
- Cited by
- 188
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 10 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 12
- FWCI
- 4.98
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Murdoch University Research Portal (submittedVersion)
- Adelaide Research & Scholarship (AR&S) (University of Adelaide) (submittedVersion)
- CONICET Digital (CONICET) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
- Funders
- National Center for Research Resources (C06RR020141, RR 15459-01, C06RR015459, RR 020141-01, P51RR000167)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Urology › Comparative Animal Anatomy Studies
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Physiological and biochemical adaptations
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Animal Nutrition and Physiology
- Keywords
- flight adaptation, birds, bats, small intestine, paracellular absorption, intestinal surface area, villi, digestive adaptation, flight loads, energy metabolism, comparative anatomy
- MeSH terms
- Adaptation, Physiological, Animals, Birds, Body Weight, Chiroptera, Energy Metabolism, Flight, Animal, Intestinal Absorption, Intestine, Small, Mammals, Organ Size, Rhamnose, Species Specificity, Weight-Bearing, 3-O-Methylglucose, Mice, Rats
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review