Cited by 188Comparative Animal Anatomy StudiesPhysiological and biochemical adaptationsAnimal Nutrition and Physiology

The digestive adaptation of flying vertebrates: High intestinal paracellular absorption compensates for smaller guts

Open access
Caviedes-Vidal, Enrique, McWhorter, Todd J., Lavin, Shana R., Chediack, Juan G., Tracy, Christopher R., Karasov, William H.·2007·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Anecdotal evidence suggests that birds have smaller intestines than mammals. In the present analysis, we show that small birds and bats have significantly shorter small intestines and less small intestine nominal (smooth bore tube) surface area than similarly sized nonflying mammals. The corresponding >50% reduction in intestinal volume and hence mass of digesta carried is advantageous because the energetic costs of flight increase with load carried. But, a central dilemma is how birds and bats satisfy relatively high energy needs with less absorptive surface area. Here, we further show that an enhanced paracellular pathway for intestinal absorption of water-soluble nutrients such as glucose and amino acids may compensate for reduced small intestines in volant vertebrates. The evidence is that l -rhamnose and other similarly sized, metabolically inert, nonactively transported monosaccharides are absorbed significantly more in small birds and bats than in nonflying mammals. To broaden our comparison and test the veracity of our finding we surveyed the literature for other similar studies of paracellular absorption. The patterns found in our focal species held up when we included other species surveyed in our analysis. Significantly greater amplification of digestive surface area by villi in small birds, also uncovered by our analysis, may provide one mechanistic explanation for the observation of higher paracellular absorption relative to nonflying mammals. It appears that reduced intestinal size and relatively enhanced intestinal paracellular absorption can be added to the suite of adaptations that have evolved in actively flying vertebrates.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.0703159104

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Increased paracellular absorption compared to other mammals compensates for shorter intestines.

    “Additionally, increased paracellular absorption compared to other mammals compensates for shorter intestines [22].”

    From Mammalian intestinal allometry, phylogeny, trophic level and climate (2021) · cites this paper as [22]

    The Results and Discussion report higher paracellular absorption in small birds and bats than in nonflying mammals. The paper also finds shorter small intestines in those flying vertebrates, but describes compensation as a hypothesis consistent with the data, rather than an established effect. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Volant mammals had shorter total intestines than terrestrial mammals.

    “Similar to previous findings, volant mammals had shorter total intestines than terrestrial mammals [15, 21, 22]”

    From Mammalian intestinal allometry, phylogeny, trophic level and climate (2021) · cites this paper as [22]

    The Results and Discussion report that bats had significantly shorter intestines than comparably sized nonflying mammals. The paper specifies its finding as shorter small intestines, however, and does not establish that bats had shorter total intestinal length. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Special adaptations to a volant lifestyle are thought to influence GIT anatomy.

    “Other factors than diet thought to influence GIT anatomy include special adaptations to a volant [15, 21, 22] or a marine [23-25] lifestyle, or the aridity of the habitat [16, 26, 27].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. [24]Lavin SR (2007) PhD thesis (University of Wisconsin, Madison).
  2. [27]Teeling EC, Springer MS, Madsen O, Bates P, O'Brien SJ, Murphy WJ (2005) Science 307:580-584.
  3. [47]Riviere JE (1999) Comparative Pharmacokinetics: Principles, Techniques and Applications (Iowa State Univ Press, Ames).
  4. [56]Caviedes-Vidal E, Karasov WH, Chediack JG, Fasulo V, Cruz-Neto AP, Otani L (2007) PLoS , in press.
  5. [79]Brunetto AL, Pearson ADJ, Gibson R, Bateman DN, Rashid MU (1990) Eur J Clin Invest 20:279-284.
  6. [81]Fleming SC, Kynaston JA, Laker MF, Pearson ADJ, Kapembwa MS, Griffin GE (1993) J Chromatogr 640:293-297.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Caviedes-Vidal, E., McWhorter, T. J., Lavin, S. R., Chediack, J. G., Tracy, C. R., & Karasov, W. H.
Affiliations
  • *Laboratorio de Biología “Prof. E. Caviedes Codelia,” Facultad de Ciencias Humanas, and Departamento de Bioquímica y Ciencias Biológicas, Universidad Nacional de San Luís–Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas, 5700 San Luis, Argentina;
  • University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
  • Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (AR)
  • Ben-Gurion University of the Negev (IL)
Corresponding author
McWhorter, Todd J.
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2007-11-27
Volume
104
Issue
48
Pages
19132-19137
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2142487553
Cited by
188
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 12
FWCI
4.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Murdoch University Research Portal (submittedVersion)
  • Adelaide Research & Scholarship (AR&S) (University of Adelaide) (submittedVersion)
  • CONICET Digital (CONICET) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
Funders
National Center for Research Resources (C06RR020141, RR 15459-01, C06RR015459, RR 020141-01, P51RR000167)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Urology › Comparative Animal Anatomy Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Physiological and biochemical adaptations
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Animal Nutrition and Physiology
Keywords
flight adaptation, birds, bats, small intestine, paracellular absorption, intestinal surface area, villi, digestive adaptation, flight loads, energy metabolism, comparative anatomy
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Physiological, Animals, Birds, Body Weight, Chiroptera, Energy Metabolism, Flight, Animal, Intestinal Absorption, Intestine, Small, Mammals, Organ Size, Rhamnose, Species Specificity, Weight-Bearing, 3-O-Methylglucose, Mice, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review