The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Genome organization in dicots: Genome duplication in Arabidopsis and synteny between soybean and Arabidopsis
Open accessAbstract
Synteny between soybean and Arabidopsis was studied by using conceptual translations of DNA sequences from loci that map to soybean linkage groups A2, J, and L. Synteny was found between these linkage groups and all four of the Arabidopsis chromosomes, where GenBank contained enough sequence for synteny to be identified confidently. Soybean linkage group A2 (soyA2) and Arabidopsis chromosome I showed significant synteny over almost their entire lengths, with only 2–3 chromosomal rearrangements required to bring the maps into substantial agreement. Smaller blocks of synteny were identified between soyA2 and Arabidopsis chromosomes IV and V (near the RPP 5 and RPP 8 genes) and between soyA2 and Arabidopsis chromosomes I and V (near the Phy A and Phy C genes). These subchromosomal syntenic regions were themselves homeologous, suggesting that Arabidopsis has undergone a number of segmental duplications or possibly a complete genome duplication during its evolution. Homologies between the homeologous soybean linkage groups J and L and Arabidopsis chromosomes II and IV also revealed evidence of segmental duplication in Arabidopsis . Further support for this hypothesis was provided by the observation of very close linkage in Arabidopsis of homologs of soybean Vsp 27 and Bng181 (three locations) and purple acid phosphatase-like sequences and homologs of soybean A256 (five locations). Simulations show that the synteny and duplications we report are unlikely to have arisen by chance during our analysis of the homology reports.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The Evolutionary Fate and Consequences of Duplicate Genes
Lynch, M., & Conery, J. S. (2000) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.290.5494.1151 · Cited by 4,988
Functional Divergence of Duplicated Genes Formed by Polyploidy during Arabidopsis Evolution[W]
Blanc, G., & Wolfe, K. H. (2004) · The Plant Cell · doi:10.1105/tpc.021410 · Cited by 1,076
Widespread genome duplications throughout the history of flowering plants
Cui, L., Wall, P. K., Leebens-Mack, J. H., Lindsay, B. G., Soltis, D. E., Doyle, J. J., Soltis, P. S., Carlson, J. E., Arumuganathan, K., Barakat, A., et al. (2006) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.4825606 · Cited by 746
A Recent Polyploidy Superimposed on Older Large-Scale Duplications in the Arabidopsis Genome
Blanc, G., Hokamp, K., & Wolfe, K. H. (2003) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.751803 · Cited by 724
The hidden duplication past of Arabidopsis thaliana
Simillion, C., Vandepoele, K., Van Montagu, M. C. E., Zabeau, M., & Van de Peer, Y. (2002) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.212522399 · Cited by 494
Metadata
- Authors
- Grant, D., Cregan, P., & Shoemaker, R. C.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2000-04-04
- Volume
- 97
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 4168-4173
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2032223502
- Cited by
- 270
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 54.48
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Genome organization in dicots: Genome duplication in Arabidopsis and synteny between soybean and Arabidopsis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.070430597
- The paper
- Grant, D., Cregan, P., & Shoemaker, R. C. (2000). Genome organization in dicots: Genome duplication in Arabidopsis and synteny between soybean and Arabidopsis. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.070430597
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.