The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Drought mediates the importance of stochastic community assembly
Open accessAbstract
Historically, the biodiversity and composition of species in a locality was thought to be influenced primarily by deterministic factors. In such cases, species' niches create differential responses to environmental conditions and interspecific interactions, which combine to determine that locality's biodiversity and species composition. More recently, proponents of the neutral theory have placed a premium on how stochastic factors, such as birth, death, colonization, and extinction (termed “ecological drift”) influence diversity and species composition in a locality independent of their niches. Here, I develop the hypothesis that the relative importance of stochastic ecological drift and/or priority effects depend on the harshness of the ecological filter in those habitats. I established long-term experimental ponds to explore the relative importance of community assembly history and drought on patterns of community compositional similarity among ponds that were otherwise similar in their environmental conditions. I show considerable site-to-site variation in pond community composition in the absence of drought that likely resulted from a combination of stochastic ecological drift and priority effects. However, in ponds that experienced drought, I found much higher similarity among communities that likely resulted from niche-selection filtering out species from the regional pool that could not tolerate such environmental harshness. These results implicate the critical role for understanding the processes of community assembly when examining patterns of biodiversity at different spatial scales.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Distance‐Based Tests for Homogeneity of Multivariate Dispersions
Anderson, M. J. (2006) · Biometrics · doi:10.1111/j.1541-0420.2005.00440.x · Cited by 3,304
Cited by
Stochastic Community Assembly: Does It Matter in Microbial Ecology?
Zhou, J., & Ning, D. (2017) · Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews · doi:10.1128/mmbr.00002-17 · Cited by 2,773
A general framework for quantitatively assessing ecological stochasticity
Ning, D., Deng, Y., Tiedje, J. M., & Zhou, J. (2019) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1904623116 · Cited by 1,255
Changes in assembly processes in soil bacterial communities following a wildfire disturbance
Ferrenberg, S., O’Neill, S. P., Knelman, J. E., Todd, B., Duggan, S., Bradley, D., Robinson, T., Schmidt, S. K., Townsend, A. R., Williams, M. W., et al. (2013) · The ISME Journal · doi:10.1038/ismej.2013.11 · Cited by 445
Biodiversity under threat in glacier-fed river systems
Jacobsen, D., Milner, A. M., Brown, L. E., & Dangles, O. (2012) · Nature Climate Change · doi:10.1038/nclimate1435 · Cited by 342
Disturbance alters beta‐diversity but not the relative importance of community assembly mechanisms
Myers, J. A., Chase, J. M., Crandall, R. M., & Jiménez, I. (2015) · Journal of Ecology · doi:10.1111/1365-2745.12436 · Cited by 158
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Chase, J. M.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2007-10-30
- Volume
- 104
- Issue
- 44
- Pages
- 17430-17434
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2156151748
- Cited by
- 1,069
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 21.52
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Drought mediates the importance of stochastic community assembly. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.0704350104
- The paper
- Chase, J. M. (2007). Drought mediates the importance of stochastic community assembly. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0704350104
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.