The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The power of species sorting: Local factors drive bacterial community composition over a wide range of spatial scales
Open accessAbstract
There is a vivid debate on the relative importance of local and regional factors in shaping microbial communities, and on whether microbial organisms show a biogeographic signature in their distribution. Taking a metacommunity approach, spatial factors can become important either through dispersal limitation (compare large spatial scales) or mass effects (in case of strongly connected systems). We here analyze two datasets on bacterial communities [characterized by community fingerprinting through denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE)] in meso- to eutrophic shallow lakes to investigate the importance of spatial factors at three contrasting scales. Variation partitioning on datasets of both the bacterial communities of 11 shallow lakes that are part of a strongly interconnected and densely packed pond system <1 km apart, three groups of shallow lakes ≈100 km apart, as well as these three groups of shallow lakes combined that span a large part of a North-South gradient in Europe (>2,500 km) shows a strong impact of local environmental factors on bacterial community composition, with a marginal impact of spatial distance. Our results indicate that dispersal is not strongly limiting even at large spatial scales, and that mass effects do not have a strong impact on bacterial communities even in physically connected systems. We suggest that the fast population growth rates of bacteria facilitate efficient species sorting along environmental gradients in bacterial communities over a very broad range of dispersal rates.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The diversity and biogeography of soil bacterial communities
Fierer, N., & Jackson, R. B. (2006) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0507535103 · Cited by 5,711
Cited by
The Application of Ecological Theory Toward an Understanding of the Human Microbiome
Costello, E. K., Stagaman, K., Dethlefsen, L., Bohannan, B. J. M., & Relman, D. A. (2012) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1224203 · Cited by 1,437
Chen, W., Ren, K., Isabwe, A., Chen, H., Liu, M., & Yang, J. (2019) · Microbiome · doi:10.1186/s40168-019-0749-8 · Cited by 804
Microbial communities in natural and disturbed peatlands: A review
Andersen, R., Chapman, S. J., & Artz, R. R. E. (2013) · Soil Biology and Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/j.soilbio.2012.10.003 · Cited by 401
Astorga, A., Oksanen, J., Luoto, M., Soininen, J., Virtanen, R., & Muotka, T. (2012) · Global Ecology and Biogeography · doi:10.1111/j.1466-8238.2011.00681.x · Cited by 360
Langenheder, S., & Székely, A. J. (2011) · The ISME Journal · doi:10.1038/ismej.2010.207 · Cited by 355
Metadata
- Authors
- Van der Gucht, K., Cottenie, K., Muylaert, K., Vloemans, N., Cousin, S., Declerck, S., Jeppesen, E., Conde-Porcuna, J.-M., Schwenk, K., Zwart, G., Degans, H., Vyverman, W., & De Meester, L.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2007-12-18
- Volume
- 104
- Issue
- 51
- Pages
- 20404-20409
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2032709772
- Cited by
- 476
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 14.22
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The power of species sorting: Local factors drive bacterial community composition over a wide range of spatial scales. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.0707200104
- The paper
- Van der Gucht, K., Cottenie, K., Muylaert, K., Vloemans, N., Cousin, S., Declerck, S., Jeppesen, E., Conde-Porcuna, J.-M., Schwenk, K., Zwart, G., Degans, H., Vyverman, W., & De Meester, L. (2007). The power of species sorting: Local factors drive bacterial community composition over a wide range of spatial scales. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0707200104
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.