Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 356

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Identification of genotype-correlated sensitivity to selective kinase inhibitors by using high-throughput tumor cell line profiling

Open access
McDermott, Ultan, Sharma, Sreenath V., Dowell, Lori, Greninger, Patricia, Montagut, Clara, Lamb, Jennifer, Archibald, Heidi, Raudales, Raul, Tam, Angela, Lee, Diana, Rothenberg, S. Michael, Supko, Jeffrey G., Sordella, Raffaella, Ulkus, Lindsey E., Iafrate, A. John, Maheswaran, Shyamala, Njauw, Ching Ni, Tsao, Hensin, Drew, Lisa, Hanke, Jeff H., Ma, Xiao-Jun, Erlander, Mark G., Gray, Nathanael S., Haber, Daniel A., Settleman, Jeffrey·2007·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Kinase inhibitors constitute an important new class of cancer drugs, whose selective efficacy is largely determined by underlying tumor cell genetics. We established a high-throughput platform to profile 500 cell lines derived from diverse epithelial cancers for sensitivity to 14 kinase inhibitors. Most inhibitors were ineffective against unselected cell lines but exhibited dramatic cell killing of small nonoverlapping subsets. Cells with exquisite sensitivity to EGFR, HER2, MET, or BRAF kinase inhibitors were marked by activating mutations or amplification of the drug target. Although most cell lines recapitulated known tumor-associated genotypes, the screen revealed low-frequency drug-sensitizing genotypes in tumor types not previously associated with drug susceptibility. Furthermore, comparing drugs thought to target the same kinase revealed striking differences, predictive of clinical efficacy. Genetically defined cancer subsets, irrespective of tissue type, predict response to kinase inhibitors, and provide an important preclinical model to guide early clinical applications of novel targeted inhibitors.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.0707498104

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Cited by

See all 356

Metadata

Authors
McDermott, U., Sharma, S. V., Dowell, L., Greninger, P., Montagut, C., Lamb, J., Archibald, H., Raudales, R., Tam, A., Lee, D., Rothenberg, S. M., Supko, J. G., Sordella, R., Ulkus, L. E., Iafrate, A. J., Maheswaran, S., Njauw, C. N., Tsao, H., Drew, L., Hanke, J. H., Ma, X.-J., Erlander, M. G., Gray, N. S., Haber, D. A., & Settleman, J.
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2007-12-11
Volume
104
Issue
50
Pages
19936-19941
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2008345619
Cited by
356
References
3
FWCI
22.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Identification of genotype-correlated sensitivity to selective kinase inhibitors by using high-throughput tumor cell line profiling. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.0707498104
The paper
McDermott, U., Sharma, S. V., Dowell, L., Greninger, P., Montagut, C., Lamb, J., Archibald, H., Raudales, R., Tam, A., Lee, D., Rothenberg, S. M., Supko, J. G., Sordella, R., Ulkus, L. E., Iafrate, A. J., Maheswaran, S., Njauw, C. N., Tsao, H., Drew, L., . . . Settleman, J. (2007). Identification of genotype-correlated sensitivity to selective kinase inhibitors by using high-throughput tumor cell line profiling. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0707498104

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.