Cited by 12,617

Cluster analysis and display of genome-wide expression patterns

Eisen, Michael B., Spellman, Paul T., Brown, Patrick O., Botstein, David·1998·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

A system of cluster analysis for genome-wide expression data from DNA microarray hybridization is described that uses standard statistical algorithms to arrange genes according to similarity in pattern of gene expression. The output is displayed graphically, conveying the clustering and the underlying expression data simultaneously in a form intuitive for biologists. We have found in the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae that clustering gene expression data groups together efficiently genes of known similar function, and we find a similar tendency in human data. Thus patterns seen in genome-wide expression experiments can be interpreted as indications of the status of cellular processes. Also, coexpression of genes of known function with poorly characterized or novel genes may provide a simple means of gaining leads to the functions of many genes for which information is not available currently.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.95.25.14863

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Hierarchical clustering based on average linkage of Pearson Correlation of miRNA profiles revealed non-random partition of samples into two major branches, one containing all five individual neuron types and the other containing the two tissue types.

    “Hierarchical clustering based on the average linkage of Pearson Correlation (Eisen et al., 1998) of miRNA profiles revealed non-random partition of the samples into two major branches, one containing all five individual neuron types and the other containing the two tissue types (Figure 3).”

    From Cell-Type-Based Analysis of MicroRNA Profiles in the Mouse Brain (2012) · cites this paper as Eisen et al., 1998

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. [4]Kohonen, T. (1997) Self-Organizing Maps (Springer, New York).
  2. [6]Schena, M., Shalon, D., Heller, R., Chai, A., Brown, P. O. & Davis, R. W. (1996) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 93, 10614-10619.
  3. [9]Spellman, P. T., Sherlock, G., Iyer, V. R., Zhang, M., Anders, K., Eisen, M. B., Brown, P. O., Botstein, D. & Futcher, B. (1998). Mol. Biol. Cell , in press.
  4. [11]Iyer, V. R., Eisen, M. B., Ross, D. R., Schuler, G., Moore, T., Lee, J. C. F., Trent, J. M., Hudson, J., Boguski, M., Lashkari, D., et al. (1998) Science , in press.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Eisen, M. B., Spellman, P. T., Brown, P. O., & Botstein, D.
Affiliations
Department of Genetics and Department of Biochemistry and Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Stanford University School of Medicine, 300 Pasteur Avenue, Stanford, CA 94305
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
1998-12-08
Volume
95
Issue
25
Pages
14863-14868
ISSN
  • 0027-8424
  • 1091-6490
Cited by
12,617
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review