Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 466

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 49 of the 49 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Membrane damage by human islet amyloid polypeptide through fibril growth at the membrane

Open access
Engel, Maarten F. M., Khemtémourian, Lucie, Kleijer, Cécile C., Meeldijk, Hans J. D., Jacobs, Jet, Verkleij, Arie J., de Kruijff, Ben, Killian, J. Antoinette, Höppener, Jo W. M.·2008·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Fibrillar protein deposits (amyloid) in the pancreatic islets of Langerhans are thought to be involved in death of the insulin-producing islet β cells in type 2 diabetes mellitus. It has been suggested that the mechanism of this β cell death involves membrane disruption by human islet amyloid polypeptide (hIAPP), the major constituent of islet amyloid. However, the molecular mechanism of hIAPP-induced membrane disruption is not known. Here, we propose a hypothesis that growth of hIAPP fibrils at the membrane causes membrane damage. We studied the kinetics of hIAPP-induced membrane damage in relation to hIAPP fibril growth and found that the kinetic profile of hIAPP-induced membrane damage is characterized by a lag phase and a sigmoidal transition, which matches the kinetic profile of hIAPP fibril growth. The observation that seeding accelerates membrane damage supports the hypothesis. In addition, variables that are well known to affect hIAPP fibril formation, i.e., the presence of a fibril formation inhibitor, hIAPP concentration, and lipid composition, were found to have the same effect on hIAPP-induced membrane damage. Furthermore, electron microscopy analysis showed that hIAPP fibrils line the surface of distorted phospholipid vesicles, in agreement with the notion that hIAPP fibril growth at the membrane and membrane damage are physically connected. Together, these observations point toward a mechanism in which growth of hIAPP fibrils, rather than a particular hIAPP species, is responsible for the observed membrane damage. This hypothesis provides an additional mechanism next to the previously proposed role of oligomers as the main cytotoxic species of amyloidogenic proteins.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.0708354105

Cites

49 of 49 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 49 references

Cited by

See all 466

Metadata

Authors
Engel, M. F. M., Khemtémourian, L., Kleijer, C. C., Meeldijk, H. J. D., Jacobs, J., Verkleij, A. J., de Kruijff, B., Killian, J. A., & Höppener, J. W. M.
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2008-04-22
Volume
105
Issue
16
Pages
6033-6038
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2141035467
Cited by
466
References
49
FWCI
21.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Membrane damage by human islet amyloid polypeptide through fibril growth at the membrane. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.0708354105
The paper
Engel, M. F. M., Khemtémourian, L., Kleijer, C. C., Meeldijk, H. J. D., Jacobs, J., Verkleij, A. J., de Kruijff, B., Killian, J. A., & Höppener, J. W. M. (2008). Membrane damage by human islet amyloid polypeptide through fibril growth at the membrane. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0708354105

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.