Sex-specific perceptual spaces for a vertebrate basal social aggregative behavior
Open accessAbstract
Loose aggregations of fishes, or shoals, are a basal social organization of vertebrates and offer a valuable opportunity to determine how individual perceptions influence group formation. We used zebrafish, Danio rerio , to comprehensively investigate the preference space for shoaling related to adult pigment pattern variation, presented in the form of 17 zebrafish pigment pattern mutants or closely related species. We examined all combinations of these phenotypes in 2,920 initial and replicated preference tests, and used as subjects both domesticated laboratory stocks and wild-caught fish. By using multidimensional scaling and other approaches, we show that laboratory and wild zebrafish exhibit similar preferences, yet, unexpectedly, these preferences differ markedly between sexes, and also from how human observers perceive the same pigment patterns. Whereas zebrafish males respond to two traits (species and stripe patterning) in deciding whether to join a shoal, zebrafish female preferences do not correlate with a priori identifiable traits, and neither perceptual world is correlated with that of human observers. The observed zebrafish sex differences run counter to the most commonly accepted explanations for the individual selective advantages gained by shoaling. More generally, these data describe very different perceptual worlds between sexes and reveal the importance of sex differences in social group formation, as well as the critical importance of defining species specificity in visual signaling.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The resulting iridophore subtypes likely allow the zebrafish to alter its skin patterning to make it more or less distinctive, a trait crucial for the fish to be able to join shoals or obscure itself.
“The resulting iridophore subtypes likely allow the zebrafish to alter its skin patterning to make it more or less distinctive, a trait crucial for the fish to be able to join shoals or obscure itself48,49”
From In situ differentiation of iridophore crystallotypes underlies zebrafish stripe patterning (2020) · cites this paper as [49]
The paper reports that adult pigment-pattern variation affects shoaling preferences, particularly males’ responses to stripe patterning (p. 1; Results, p. 2). It describes iridophores as components of zebrafish stripes and interstripes (Results, p. 1), but does not show that iridophore subtypes let fish alter their patterns or obscure themselves. (LLM, conf=0.87)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- [29]Ingwer B, Groenen PJF (2005) Modern Multidimensional Scaling: Theory and Applications (Springer, New York).
- [30]Kruskal JB, Wish M (1978) Multidimensional Scaling (SAGE, Newbury Park, CA).
- [36]Maynard-Smith J (2003) Animal Signals (Oxford Univ Press, Oxford).
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Advancing biology through a deeper understanding of zebrafish ecology and evolution.
Parichy, D. M. (2015) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.05635 · Cited by 203 · see citing works
Self-citationIn situ differentiation of iridophore crystallotypes underlies zebrafish stripe patterning
Gur, D., Bain, E. J., Johnson, K. R., Aman, A. J., Pasolli, H. A., Flynn, J. D., Allen, M. C., Deheyn, D. D., Lee, J. C., Lippincott-Schwartz, J., et al. (2020) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-020-20088-1 · Cited by 69 · see citing works
Self-citationControl of a specific motor program by a small brain area in zebrafish
Fajardo, O., Zhu, P., & Friedrich, R. W. (2013) · Frontiers in Neural Circuits · doi:10.3389/fncir.2013.00067 · Cited by 47 · see citing works
Zebrafish relatives as models for functional comparative genetics and genomics
Podobnik, M., Lu, Y., Irion, U., & Currie, P. D. (2026) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41576-026-01007-4 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
- Authors
- Engeszer, R. E., Wang, G., Ryan, M. J., & Parichy, D. M.
- Affiliations
- University of Washington (US)
- The University of Texas at Austin (US)
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Publisher
- National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2008-01-22
- Volume
- 105
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 929-933
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- PMC
- PMC2242707
- OpenAlex
- W2051947514
- Cited by
- 84
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 6
- FWCI
- 6.37
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation (0541733)
- University of Washington
- National Institutes of Health
- National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R01GM062182)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Animal Behavior and Reproduction
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Zebrafish Biomedical Research Applications
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Fish biology, ecology, and behavior
- Keywords
- shoaling behavior, zebrafish, sex differences, visual perception, pigmentation patterns, social aggregation, preference space, visual signaling, species specificity, wild fish
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Behavior, Animal, Female, Fishes, Humans, Male, Phenotype, Sex Characteristics, Social Behavior, Space Perception
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review