The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Algal blooms reduce the uptake of toxic methylmercury in freshwater food webs
Open accessAbstract
Mercury accumulation in fish is a global public health concern, because fish are the primary source of toxic methylmercury to humans. Fish from all lakes do not pose the same level of risk to consumers. One of the most intriguing patterns is that potentially dangerous mercury concentrations can be found in fish from clear, oligotrophic lakes whereas fish from greener, eutrophic lakes often carry less mercury. In this study, we experimentally tested the hypothesis that increasing algal biomass reduces mercury accumulation at higher trophic levels through the dilution of mercury in consumed algal cells. Under bloom dilution, as algal biomass increases, the concentration of mercury per cell decreases, resulting in a lower dietary input to grazers and reduced bioaccumulation in algal-rich eutrophic systems. To test this hypothesis, we added enriched stable isotopes of Hg to experimental mesocosms and measured the uptake of toxic methylmercury (CH 3 200 Hg + ) and inorganic 201 Hg 2+ by biota at several algal concentrations. We reduced absolute spike detection limits by 50–100 times compared with previous techniques, which allowed us to conduct experiments at the extremely low aqueous Hg concentrations that are typical of natural systems. We found that increasing algae reduced CH 3 Hg + concentrations in zooplankton 2–3-fold. Bloom dilution may provide a mechanistic explanation for lower CH 3 Hg + accumulation by zooplankton and fish in algal-rich relative to algal-poor systems.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Nonpoint Pollution of Surface Waters with Phosphorus and Nitrogen
Carpenter, S. R., Caraco, N. F., Correll, D. L., Howarth, R. W., Sharpley, A. N., & Smith, V. H. (1998) · Ecological Applications · doi:10.1890/1051-0761(1998)008[0559:nposww]2.0.co;2 · Cited by 6,099
Brooks, J. L., & Dodson, S. I. (1965) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.150.3692.28 · Cited by 3,280
Cited by
Reporting of variations in the natural isotopic composition of mercury
Blum, J. D., & Bergquist, B. A. (2007) · Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry · doi:10.1007/s00216-007-1236-9 · Cited by 710
Self-citationERMITE-Consortium, Younger, P. L., & Wolkersdorfer, C. (2004) · Mine Water and the Environment · doi:10.1007/s10230-004-0028-0 · Cited by 290
Mercury in fish, bed sediment, and water from streams across the United States, 1998-2005
Scudder, B. C., Chasar, L. C., Wentz, D. A., Bauch, N. J., Brigham, M. E., Moran, P. W., & Krabbenhoft, D. P. (2009) · Scientific Investigations Report · doi:10.3133/sir20095109 · Cited by 139
Allen, E. W., Prepas, E. E., Gabos, S., Strachan, W. M., & Zhang, W. (2005) · Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences · doi:10.1139/f05-103 · Cited by 55
Moreno, C. E., Fjeld, E., & Lydersen, E. (2016) · Environmental Monitoring and Assessment · doi:10.1007/s10661-016-5148-z · Cited by 14
Metadata
- Authors
- Pickhardt, P. C., Folt, C. L., Chen, C. Y., Klaue, B., & Blum, J. D.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2002-03-19
- Volume
- 99
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 4419-4423
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2140058528
- Cited by
- 454
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 9.08
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Algal blooms reduce the uptake of toxic methylmercury in freshwater food webs. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.072531099
- The paper
- Pickhardt, P. C., Folt, C. L., Chen, C. Y., Klaue, B., & Blum, J. D. (2002). Algal blooms reduce the uptake of toxic methylmercury in freshwater food webs. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.072531099
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.