The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Syntrophin mutation associated with long QT syndrome through activation of the nNOS–SCN5A macromolecular complex
Open accessAbstract
Mutations in 11 genes that encode ion channels or their associated proteins cause inherited long QT syndrome (LQTS) and account for ≈75–80% of cases (LQT1–11). Direct sequencing of SNTA1 , the gene encoding α1-syntrophin, was performed in a cohort of LQTS patients that were negative for mutations in the 11 known LQTS-susceptibility genes. A missense mutation (A390V-SNTA1) was found in a patient with recurrent syncope and markedly prolonged QT interval (QTc, 530 ms). SNTA1 links neuronal nitric oxide synthase (nNOS) to the nNOS inhibitor plasma membrane Ca-ATPase subtype 4b (PMCA4b); SNTA1 also is known to associate with the cardiac sodium channel SCN5A. By using a GST-fusion protein of the C terminus of SCN5A, we showed that WT-SNTA1 interacted with SCN5A, nNOS, and PMCA4b. In contrast, A390V-SNTA1 selectively disrupted association of PMCA4b with this complex and increased direct nitrosylation of SCN5A. A390V-SNTA1 expressed with SCN5A, nNOS, and PMCA4b in heterologous cells increased peak and late sodium current compared with WT-SNTA1, and the increase was partially inhibited by NOS blockers. Expression of A390V-SNTA1 in cardiac myocytes also increased late sodium current. We conclude that the A390V mutation disrupted binding with PMCA4b, released inhibition of nNOS, caused S -nitrosylation of SCN5A, and was associated with increased late sodium current, which is the characteristic biophysical dysfunction for sodium-channel-mediated LQTS (LQT3). These results establish an SNTA1-based nNOS complex attached to SCN5A as a key regulator of sodium current and suggest that SNTA1 be considered a rare LQTS-susceptibility gene.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Protein S-nitrosylation: Purview and parameters
Hess, D. T., Matsumoto, A., Kim, S.-O., Marshall, H. E., & Stamler, J. S. (2005) · Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/nrm1569 · Cited by 2,153
Nitric Oxide and Cyclic GMP in Cell Signaling and Drug Development
Murad, F. (2006) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmsa063904 · Cited by 420
Cited by
Protein S-nitrosylation in health and disease: a current perspective
Foster, M. W., Hess, D. T., & Stamler, J. S. (2009) · Trends in Molecular Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.molmed.2009.06.007 · Cited by 752
S -Nitrosylation in Cardiovascular Signaling
Lima, B., Forrester, M. T., Hess, D. T., & Stamler, J. S. (2010) · Circulation Research · doi:10.1161/circresaha.109.207381 · Cited by 490
Long QT syndrome and short QT syndrome
Zareba, W., & Cygankiewicz, I. (2008) · Progress in Cardiovascular Diseases · doi:10.1016/j.pcad.2008.10.006 · Cited by 96
The QT Interval International GWAS Consortium (QT-IGC), Lundby, A., Rossin, E. J., Steffensen, A. B., Acha, M. R., Newton-Cheh, C., Pfeufer, A., Lynch, S. N., Olesen, S.-P., Brunak, S., et al. (2014) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/nmeth.2997 · Cited by 71
Metadata
- Authors
- Ueda, K., Valdivia, C., Medeiros-Domingo, A., Tester, D. J., Vatta, M., Farrugia, G., Ackerman, M. J., & Makielski, J. C.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2008-07-08
- Volume
- 105
- Issue
- 27
- Pages
- 9355-9360
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2081529440
- Cited by
- 326
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 24.20
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.