The DOI matches its Crossref record.
How many tree species are there in the Amazon and how many of them will go extinct?
Open accessAbstract
New roads, agricultural projects, logging, and mining are claiming an ever greater area of once-pristine Amazonian forest. The Millennium Ecosystems Assessment (MA) forecasts the extinction of a large fraction of Amazonian tree species based on projected loss of forest cover over the next several decades. How accurate are these estimates of extinction rates? We use neutral theory to estimate the number, relative abundance, and range size of tree species in the Amazon metacommunity and estimate likely tree-species extinctions under published optimistic and nonoptimistic Amazon scenarios. We estimate that the Brazilian portion of the Amazon Basin has (or had) 11,210 tree species that reach sizes >10 cm DBH (stem diameter at breast height). Of these, 3,248 species have population sizes >1 million individuals, and, ignoring possible climate-change effects, almost all of these common species persist under both optimistic and nonoptimistic scenarios. At the rare end of the abundance spectrum, however, neutral theory predicts the existence of ≈5,308 species with <10,000 individuals each that are expected to suffer nearly a 50% extinction rate under the nonoptimistic deforestation scenario and an ≈37% loss rate even under the optimistic scenario. Most of these species have small range sizes and are highly vulnerable to local habitat loss. In ensembles of 100 stochastic simulations, we found mean total extinction rates of 20% and 33% of tree species in the Brazilian Amazon under the optimistic and nonoptimistic scenarios, respectively.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Hyperdominance in the Amazonian tree flora
ter Steege, H., Pitman, N. C. A., Sabatier, D., Baraloto, C., Salomão, R. P., Guevara, J. E., Phillips, O. L., Castilho, C. V., Magnusson, W. E., Molino, J.-F., et al. (2013) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1243092 · Cited by 1,471
Self-citationNobre, C. A., Sampaio, G., Borma, L. S., Castilla-Rubio, J. C., Silva, J. S., & Cardoso, M. (2016) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1605516113 · Cited by 1,045
Biodiversity improves water quality through niche partitioning
Cardinale, B. J. (2011) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature09904 · Cited by 764
Estimating the global conservation status of more than 15,000 Amazonian tree species
ter Steege, H., Pitman, N. C. A., Killeen, T. J., Laurance, W. F., Peres, C. A., Guevara, J. E., Salomão, R. P., Castilho, C. V., Amaral, I. L., de Almeida Matos, F. D., et al. (2015) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.1500936 · Cited by 205
Anthropogenic influence on Amazonian forests in pre‐history: An ecological perspective
Bush, M. B., McMichael, C. H., Piperno, D. R., Silman, M. R., Barlow, J., Peres, C. A., Power, M., & Palace, M. W. (2015) · Journal of Biogeography · doi:10.1111/jbi.12638 · Cited by 111
Metadata
- Authors
- Hubbell, S. P., He, F., Condit, R., Borda-de-Água, L., Kellner, J., & ter Steege, H.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2008-08-12
- Volume
- 105
- Issue
- supplement_1
- Pages
- 11498-11504
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2013815516
- Cited by
- 323
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 13.33
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: How many tree species are there in the Amazon and how many of them will go extinct? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.0801915105
- The paper
- Hubbell, S. P., He, F., Condit, R., Borda-de-Água, L., Kellner, J., & ter Steege, H. (2008). How many tree species are there in the Amazon and how many of them will go extinct? Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0801915105
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.