The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Many species in one: DNA barcoding overestimates the number of species when nuclear mitochondrial pseudogenes are coamplified
Open accessAbstract
Nuclear mitochondrial pseudogenes (numts) are nonfunctional copies of mtDNA in the nucleus that have been found in major clades of eukaryotic organisms. They can be easily coamplified with orthologous mtDNA by using conserved universal primers; however, this is especially problematic for DNA barcoding, which attempts to characterize all living organisms by using a short fragment of the mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase I (COI) gene. Here, we study the effect of numts on DNA barcoding based on phylogenetic and barcoding analyses of numt and mtDNA sequences in two divergent lineages of arthropods: grasshoppers and crayfish. Single individuals from both organisms have numts of the COI gene, many of which are highly divergent from orthologous mtDNA sequences, and DNA barcoding analysis incorrectly overestimates the number of unique species based on the standard metric of 3% sequence divergence. Removal of numts based on a careful examination of sequence characteristics, including indels, in-frame stop codons, and nucleotide composition, drastically reduces the incorrect inferences of the number of unique species, but even such rigorous quality control measures fail to identify certain numts. We also show that the distribution of numts is lineage-specific and the presence of numts cannot be known a priori. Whereas DNA barcoding strives for rapid and inexpensive generation of molecular species tags, we demonstrate that the presence of COI numts makes this goal difficult to achieve when numts are prevalent and can introduce serious ambiguity into DNA barcoding.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Dinsdale, A., Cook, L., Riginos, C., Buckley, Y. M., & Barro, P. D. (2010) · Annals of the Entomological Society of America · doi:10.1603/an09061 · Cited by 676
Molecular Poltergeists: Mitochondrial DNA Copies (numts) in Sequenced Nuclear Genomes
Hazkani-Covo, E., Zeller, R. M., & Martin, W. (2010) · PLoS Genetics · doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1000834 · Cited by 629
Taxon‐specific PCR for DNA barcoding arthropod prey in bat faeces
ZEALE, M. R. K., BUTLIN, R. K., BARKER, G. L. A., LEES, D. C., & JONES, G. (2011) · Molecular Ecology Resources · doi:10.1111/j.1755-0998.2010.02920.x · Cited by 593
DNA Barcoding of Marine Metazoa
Bucklin, A., Steinke, D., & Blanco-Bercial, L. (2011) · Annual Review of Marine Science · doi:10.1146/annurev-marine-120308-080950 · Cited by 559
“COI-like” Sequences Are Becoming Problematic in Molecular Systematic and DNA Barcoding Studies
Buhay, J. E. (2009) · Journal of Crustacean Biology · doi:10.1651/08-3020.1 · Cited by 335
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Song, H., Buhay, J. E., Whiting, M. F., & Crandall, K. A.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2008-09-09
- Volume
- 105
- Issue
- 36
- Pages
- 13486-13491
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2045295541
- Cited by
- 1,034
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 52.01
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Many species in one: DNA barcoding overestimates the number of species when nuclear mitochondrial pseudogenes are coamplified. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.0803076105
- The paper
- Song, H., Buhay, J. E., Whiting, M. F., & Crandall, K. A. (2008). Many species in one: DNA barcoding overestimates the number of species when nuclear mitochondrial pseudogenes are coamplified. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0803076105
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.