Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 507

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A noncovalent class of papain-like protease/deubiquitinase inhibitors blocks SARS virus replication

Open access
Ratia, Kiira, Pegan, Scott, Takayama, Jun, Sleeman, Katrina, Coughlin, Melissa, Baliji, Surendranath, Chaudhuri, Rima, Fu, Wentao, Prabhakar, Bellur S., Johnson, Michael E., Baker, Susan C., Ghosh, Arun K., Mesecar, Andrew D.·2008·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

We report the discovery and optimization of a potent inhibitor against the papain-like protease (PLpro) from the coronavirus that causes severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS-CoV). This unique protease is not only responsible for processing the viral polyprotein into its functional units but is also capable of cleaving ubiquitin and ISG15 conjugates and plays a significant role in helping SARS-CoV evade the human immune system. We screened a structurally diverse library of 50,080 compounds for inhibitors of PLpro and discovered a noncovalent lead inhibitor with an IC 50 value of 20 μM, which was improved to 600 nM via synthetic optimization. The resulting compound, GRL0617, inhibited SARS-CoV viral replication in Vero E6 cells with an EC 50 of 15 μM and had no associated cytotoxicity. The X-ray structure of PLpro in complex with GRL0617 indicates that the compound has a unique mode of inhibition whereby it binds within the S4-S3 subsites of the enzyme and induces a loop closure that shuts down catalysis at the active site. These findings provide proof-of-principle that PLpro is a viable target for development of antivirals directed against SARS-CoV, and that potent noncovalent cysteine protease inhibitors can be developed with specificity directed toward pathogenic deubiquitinating enzymes without inhibiting host DUBs.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.0805240105

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 507

Metadata

Authors
Ratia, K., Pegan, S., Takayama, J., Sleeman, K., Coughlin, M., Baliji, S., Chaudhuri, R., Fu, W., Prabhakar, B. S., Johnson, M. E., Baker, S. C., Ghosh, A. K., & Mesecar, A. D.
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2008-10-21
Volume
105
Issue
42
Pages
16119-16124
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W1970232220
Cited by
507
References
2
FWCI
6.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A noncovalent class of papain-like protease/deubiquitinase inhibitors blocks SARS virus replication. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.0805240105
The paper
Ratia, K., Pegan, S., Takayama, J., Sleeman, K., Coughlin, M., Baliji, S., Chaudhuri, R., Fu, W., Prabhakar, B. S., Johnson, M. E., Baker, S. C., Ghosh, A. K., & Mesecar, A. D. (2008). A noncovalent class of papain-like protease/deubiquitinase inhibitors blocks SARS virus replication. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0805240105

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.