The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Simple prediction of interaction strengths in complex food webs
Open accessAbstract
Darwin's classic image of an “entangled bank” of interdependencies among species has long suggested that it is difficult to predict how the loss of one species affects the abundance of others. We show that for dynamical models of realistically structured ecological networks in which pair-wise consumer-resource interactions allometrically scale to the ¾ power—as suggested by metabolic theory—the effect of losing one species on another can be predicted well by simple functions of variables easily observed in nature. By systematically removing individual species from 600 networks ranging from 10–30 species, we analyzed how the strength of 254,032 possible pair-wise species interactions depended on 90 stochastically varied species, link, and network attributes. We found that the interaction strength between a pair of species is predicted well by simple functions of the two species' biomasses and the body mass of the species removed. On average, prediction accuracy increases with network size, suggesting that greater web complexity simplifies predicting interaction strengths. Applied to field data, our model successfully predicts interactions dominated by trophic effects and illuminates the sign and magnitude of important nontrophic interactions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Body size in ecological networks
WOODWARD, G., EBENMAN, B., EMMERSON, M., MONTOYA, J., OLESEN, J., VALIDO, A., & WARREN, P. (2005) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.tree.2005.04.005 · Cited by 1,251
Indirect Effects in Marine Rocky Intertidal Interaction Webs: Patterns and Importance
Menge, B. A. (1995) · Ecological Monographs · doi:10.2307/2937158 · Cited by 756
Biodiversity-ecosystem function research: Is it relevant to conservation?
Srivastava, D. S., & Vellend, M. (2005) · Annual Review of Ecology Evolution and Systematics · doi:10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.36.102003.152636 · Cited by 712
Research works printed but not linked: 33
- 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2005.00838.x · DOI
- 10.1046/j.1461-0248.2002.00354.x · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1890/03-8018 · DOI
- 10.1098/rspb.2001.1767 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1073/pnas.0501562102 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/nature02515 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1890/03-9000 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1371/journal.pbio.0050022 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/S0065-2504(05)36003-X · DOI
- 10.1890/0012-9658(1997)078[1146:TMIIIA]2.0.CO;2 · DOI
- 10.1890/03-0681 · DOI
- 10.2307/1940449 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1890/0012-9658(2000)081[0261:DEIFW]2.0.CO;2 · DOI
- 10.2307/1940154 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2006.00978.x · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/nature06359 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1098/rspb.2008.0718 · DOI
- 10.1086/285380 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1890/0012-9658(2006)87[2411:CBRINF]2.0.CO;2 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/35004572 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/35030089 · DOI
- 10.2307/2963520 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2006.00899.x · DOI
- 10.1038/18672 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/S0169-5347(00)89047-3 · DOI
- 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.36.091704.175535 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1126/science.1068326 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/27427 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1890/0012-9615(1997)067[0435:FCTCHE]2.0.CO;2 · DOI
- 10.1371/journal.pcbi.0010018 · DOI
- 10.1890/07-0965.1 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/46540 · DOI · Paper page
- L Breiman, J Friedman, R Olshen, C Stone, Classification and Regression Trees (Wadsworth & Brooks Cole, Monterey, CA). A powerful yet simple technique for ecological data analysis. Ecology 81, 3178–3192 (1984).
Cited by
Biodiversity loss and its impact on humanity
Cardinale, B. J., Duffy, J. E., Gonzalez, A., Hooper, D. U., Perrings, C., Venail, P., Narwani, A., Mace, G. M., Tilman, D., Wardle, D. A., et al. (2012) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature11148 · Cited by 7,457
Approaching a state shift in Earth’s biosphere
Barnosky, A. D., Hadly, E. A., Bascompte, J., Berlow, E. L., Brown, J. H., Fortelius, M., Getz, W. M., Harte, J., Hastings, A., Marquet, P. A., et al. (2012) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature11018 · Cited by 1,966
Self-citationHigh frequency of functional extinctions in ecological networks
Säterberg, T., Sellman, S., & Ebenman, B. (2013) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature12277 · Cited by 226
Pichler, M., Boreux, V., Klein, A., Schleuning, M., & Hartig, F. (2020) · Methods in Ecology and Evolution · doi:10.1111/2041-210x.13329 · Cited by 149
de Visser, S. N., Freymann, B. P., & Olff, H. (2011) · Journal of Animal Ecology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2656.2010.01787.x · Cited by 89
The roles and impacts of human hunter-gatherers in North Pacific marine food webs
Dunne, J. A., Maschner, H., Betts, M. W., Huntly, N., Russell, R., Williams, R. J., & Wood, S. A. (2016) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep21179 · Cited by 70
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Berlow, E. L., Dunne, J. A., Martinez, N. D., Stark, P. B., Williams, R. J., & Brose, U.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2009-01-06
- Volume
- 106
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 187-191
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2114518578
- Cited by
- 352
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 16.89
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.