The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Eight genes are required for functional reconstitution of the Caenorhabditis elegans levamisole-sensitive acetylcholine receptor
Open accessAbstract
Levamisole-sensitive acetylcholine receptors (L-AChRs) are ligand-gated ion channels that mediate excitatory neurotransmission at the neuromuscular junctions of nematodes. They constitute a major drug target for anthelminthic treatments because they can be activated by nematode-specific cholinergic agonists such as levamisole. Genetic screens conducted in Caenorhabditis elegans for resistance to levamisole toxicity identified genes that are indispensable for the biosynthesis of L-AChRs. These include 5 genes encoding distinct AChR subunits and 3 genes coding for ancillary proteins involved in assembly and trafficking of the receptors. Despite extensive analysis of L-AChRs in vivo, pharmacological and biophysical characterization of these receptors has been greatly hampered by the absence of a heterologous expression system. Using Xenopus laevis oocytes, we were able to reconstitute functional L-AChRs by coexpressing the 5 distinct receptor subunits and the 3 ancillary proteins. Strikingly, this system recapitulates the genetic requirements for receptor expression in vivo because omission of any of these 8 genes dramatically impairs L-AChR expression. We demonstrate that 3 α- and 2 non-α-subunits assemble into the same receptor. Pharmacological analysis reveals that the prototypical cholinergic agonist nicotine is unable to activate L-AChRs but rather acts as a potent allosteric inhibitor. These results emphasize the role of ancillary proteins for efficient expression of recombinant neurotransmitter receptors and open the way for in vitro screening of novel anthelminthic agents.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Soil-transmitted helminth infections: ascariasis, trichuriasis, and hookworm
Bethony, J., Brooker, S., Albonico, M., Geiger, S. M., Loukas, A., Diemert, D., & Hotez, P. J. (2006) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(06)68653-4 · Cited by 2,478
Cited by
Laing, R., Kikuchi, T., Martinelli, A., Tsai, I. J., Beech, R. N., Redman, E., Holroyd, N., Bartley, D. J., Beasley, H., Britton, C., et al. (2013) · Genome Biology · doi:10.1186/gb-2013-14-8-r88 · Cited by 373
A database of Caenorhabditis elegans behavioral phenotypes
Yemini, E., Jucikas, T., Grundy, L. J., Brown, A. E. X., & Schafer, W. R. (2013) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/nmeth.2560 · Cited by 310
The neuronal genome of Caenorhabditis elegans
Hobert, O. (2013) · WormBook · doi:10.1895/wormbook.1.161.1 · Cited by 279
Oliver, D. B., Ramachandran, S., Biswas, K., Bénard, C. Y., Doitsidou, M., McKillop, H., Genao, N., Lemons, M. L., & Francis, M. M. (2025) · doi:10.1101/2025.07.05.663213 · Cited by 1
Metadata
- Authors
- Boulin, T., Gielen, M., Richmond, J. E., Williams, D. C., Paoletti, P., & Bessereau, J.-L.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2008-11-25
- Volume
- 105
- Issue
- 47
- Pages
- 18590-18595
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2111915171
- Cited by
- 195
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 3.47
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Eight genes are required for functional reconstitution of the Caenorhabditis elegans levamisole-sensitive acetylcholine receptor. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.0806933105
- The paper
- Boulin, T., Gielen, M., Richmond, J. E., Williams, D. C., Paoletti, P., & Bessereau, J.-L. (2008). Eight genes are required for functional reconstitution of the Caenorhabditis elegans levamisole-sensitive acetylcholine receptor. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0806933105
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.