Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 220

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Optical lock-in detection imaging microscopy for contrast-enhanced imaging in living cells

Open access
Marriott, Gerard, Mao, Shu, Sakata, Tomoyo, Ran, Jing, Jackson, David K., Petchprayoon, Chutima, Gomez, Timothy J., Warp, Erica, Tulyathan, Orapim, Aaron, Holly L., Isacoff, Ehud Y., Yan, Yuling·2008·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

One of the limitations on imaging fluorescent proteins within living cells is that they are usually present in small numbers and need to be detected over a large background. We have developed the means to isolate specific fluorescence signals from background by using lock-in detection of the modulated fluorescence of a class of optical probe termed “optical switches.” This optical lock-in detection (OLID) approach involves modulating the fluorescence emission of the probe through deterministic, optical control of its fluorescent and nonfluorescent states, and subsequently applying a lock-in detection method to isolate the modulated signal of interest from nonmodulated background signals. Cross-correlation analysis provides a measure of correlation between the total fluorescence emission within single pixels of an image detected over several cycles of optical switching and a reference waveform detected within the same image over the same switching cycles. This approach to imaging provides a means to selectively detect the emission from optical switch probes among a larger population of conventional fluorescent probes and is compatible with conventional microscopes. OLID using nitrospirobenzopyran-based probes and the genetically encoded Dronpa fluorescent protein are shown to generate high-contrast images of specific structures and proteins in labeled cells in cultured and explanted neurons and in live Xenopus embryos and zebrafish larvae.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.0808882105

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 220

Metadata

Authors
Marriott, G., Mao, S., Sakata, T., Ran, J., Jackson, D. K., Petchprayoon, C., Gomez, T. J., Warp, E., Tulyathan, O., Aaron, H. L., Isacoff, E. Y., & Yan, Y.
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2008-11-18
Volume
105
Issue
46
Pages
17789-17794
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2137853644
Cited by
220
References
0
FWCI
7.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Optical lock-in detection imaging microscopy for contrast-enhanced imaging in living cells. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.0808882105
The paper
Marriott, G., Mao, S., Sakata, T., Ran, J., Jackson, D. K., Petchprayoon, C., Gomez, T. J., Warp, E., Tulyathan, O., Aaron, H. L., Isacoff, E. Y., & Yan, Y. (2008). Optical lock-in detection imaging microscopy for contrast-enhanced imaging in living cells. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0808882105

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.