Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 476

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Anti-laminin gamma-1 pemphigoid

Open access
Dainichi, Teruki, Kurono, Sadamu, Ohyama, Bungo, Ishii, Norito, Sanzen, Noriko, Hayashi, Maria, Shimono, Chisei, Taniguchi, Yukimasa, Koga, Hiroshi, Karashima, Tadashi, Yasumoto, Shinichiro, Zillikens, Detlef, Sekiguchi, Kiyotoshi, Hashimoto, Takashi·2009·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Anti-p200 pemphigoid has been characterized by autoantibodies to an unidentified 200-kDa protein (p200) of the dermal−epidermal junction. The objective of this study was to identify p200. We performed 2D gel electrophoresis of dermal extracts and immunoblotting with patients' sera, followed by MS analysis of a unique protein band. The protein band corresponded to laminin γ1. Anti-laminin γ1 mAb reacted with the anti-p200 immunoprecipitates by immunoblotting. Sera from 32 patients with anti-p200 pemphigoid showed 90% reactivity to the recombinant products of laminin γ1. None of the healthy control sera reacted with laminin γ1. By immunoblotting, reactivity of a patient's serum with p200 was competitively inhibited by adding anti-laminin γ1 C -terminus mAb. Purified anti-p200 IgG also inhibited the reactivity of this mAb to dermal laminin γ1. Most laminin γ1-positive sera showed reactivity with recombinant laminin γ1 C -terminal E8 fragment. Reactivity of patients' sera and purified IgG to dermal laminin γ1 was higher than reactivity to blood vessel laminin γ1 under reducing conditions. These results suggest that laminin γ1 is the autoantigen for patients with anti-p200 pemphigoid. The autoantibodies may specifically recognize dermal laminin γ1 with unique posttranslational modifications. The epitope is localized to the 246 C -terminal amino acids within the coiled-coil domain. The 9 C -terminal residues are known to be critically involved in laminin recognition by integrins.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.0809230106

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 476

Metadata

Authors
Dainichi, T., Kurono, S., Ohyama, B., Ishii, N., Sanzen, N., Hayashi, M., Shimono, C., Taniguchi, Y., Koga, H., Karashima, T., Yasumoto, S., Zillikens, D., Sekiguchi, K., & Hashimoto, T.
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2009-02-24
Volume
106
Issue
8
Pages
2800-2805
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2092347080
Cited by
476
References
0
FWCI
7.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Anti-laminin gamma-1 pemphigoid. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.0809230106
The paper
Dainichi, T., Kurono, S., Ohyama, B., Ishii, N., Sanzen, N., Hayashi, M., Shimono, C., Taniguchi, Y., Koga, H., Karashima, T., Yasumoto, S., Zillikens, D., Sekiguchi, K., & Hashimoto, T. (2009). Anti-laminin gamma-1 pemphigoid. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0809230106

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.