The DOI matches its Crossref record.
PIF3 is a repressor of chloroplast development
Open accessAbstract
The phytochrome-interacting factor PIF3 has been proposed to act as a positive regulator of chloroplast development. Here, we show that the pif3 mutant has a phenotype that is similar to the pif1 mutant, lacking the repressor of chloroplast development PIF1, and that a pif1pif3 double mutant has an additive phenotype in all respects. The pif mutants showed elevated protochlorophyllide levels in the dark, and etioplasts of pif mutants contained smaller prolamellar bodies and more prothylakoid membranes than corresponding wild-type seedlings, similar to previous reports of constitutive photomorphogenic mutants. Consistent with this observation, pif1 , pif3 , and pif1pif3 showed reduced hypocotyl elongation and increased cotyledon opening in the dark. Transfer of 4-d-old dark-grown seedlings to white light resulted in more chlorophyll synthesis in pif mutants over the first 2 h, and analysis of gene expression in dark-grown pif mutants indicated that key tetrapyrrole regulatory genes such as HEMA1 encoding the rate-limiting step in tetrapyrrole synthesis were already elevated 2 d after germination. Circadian regulation of HEMA1 in the dark also showed reduced amplitude and a shorter, variable period in the pif mutants, whereas expression of the core clock components TOC1 , CCA1 , and LHY was largely unaffected. Expression of both PIF1 and PIF3 was circadian regulated in dark-grown seedlings. PIF1 and PIF3 are proposed to be negative regulators that function to integrate light and circadian control in the regulation of chloroplast development.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Network Analysis of the MVA and MEP Pathways for Isoprenoid Synthesis
Vranová, E., Coman, D., & Gruissem, W. (2013) · Annual Review of Plant Biology · doi:10.1146/annurev-arplant-050312-120116 · Cited by 1,160
Light-Regulated Plant Growth and Development
Kami, C., Lorrain, S., Hornitschek, P., & Fankhauser, C. (2010) · Current Topics in Developmental Biology · doi:10.1016/s0070-2153(10)91002-8 · Cited by 927
Self-citationBiogenesis and homeostasis of chloroplasts and other plastids
Jarvis, P., & López-Juez, E. (2013) · Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/nrm3702 · Cited by 773
Toledo-Ortiz, G., Johansson, H., Lee, K. P., Bou-Torrent, J., Stewart, K., Steel, G., Rodríguez-Concepción, M., & Halliday, K. J. (2014) · PLoS Genetics · doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1004416 · Cited by 494
Toledo-Ortiz, G., Huq, E., & Rodríguez-Concepción, M. (2010) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0914428107 · Cited by 453
Metadata
- Authors
- Stephenson, P. G., Fankhauser, C., & Terry, M. J.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2009-05-05
- Volume
- 106
- Issue
- 18
- Pages
- 7654-7659
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2018399730
- Cited by
- 249
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 18.14
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: PIF3 is a repressor of chloroplast development. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.0811684106
- The paper
- Stephenson, P. G., Fankhauser, C., & Terry, M. J. (2009). PIF3 is a repressor of chloroplast development. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0811684106
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.