The DOI matches its Crossref record; 19 of the 19 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Protein deamidation
Open accessAbstract
A completely automatic computerized technique for the quantitative estimation of the deamidation rates of any protein for which the three-dimensional structure is known has been developed. Calculations of the specific deamidation rates of 170,014 asparaginyl residues in 13,335 proteins have been carried out. The calculated values have good quantitative reliability when compared with experimental measurements. These rates demonstrate that deamidation may be a biologically relevant phenomenon in a remarkably large percentage of proteins.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Geiger, T., & Clarke, S. (1987) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1016/s0021-9258(19)75855-4 · Cited by 1,311
Robinson, N. E., & Robinson, A. B. (2001) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.98.3.944 · Cited by 532
Self-citationDeamidation of Glutaminyl and Asparaginyl Residues in Peptides and Proteins
(1974) · Current Topics in Cellular Regulation · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-152808-9.50013-4 · Cited by 345
Robinson, N. E., & Robinson, A. B. (2001) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.221463198 · Cited by 287
Self-citationRobinson, A. B., McKerrow, J. H., & Cary, P. (1970) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.66.3.753 · Cited by 261
Prediction of protein deamidation rates from primary and three-dimensional structure
Robinson, N. E., & Robinson, A. B. (2001) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.071066498 · Cited by 258
Self-citationRates of nonenzymic deamidation of glutaminyl and asparaginyl residues in pentapeptides
Robinson, A. B., Scotchler, J. W., & McKerrow, J. H. (1973) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja00805a032 · Cited by 137
Distribution of glutamine and asparagine residues and their near neighbors in peptides and proteins.
Robinson, A. B., & Robinson, L. R. (1991) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.88.20.8880 · Cited by 129
Deamidation of the asparaginyl‐glycyl sequence
Meinwald, Y. C., Stimson, E. R., & Scheraga, H. A. (1986) · International journal of peptide & protein research · doi:10.1111/j.1399-3011.1986.tb03231.x · Cited by 126
Multiple Forms of Cytochrome c in the Rat
Flatmark, T., & Sletten, K. (1968) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1016/s0021-9258(18)93588-x · Cited by 123
Cited by
Sex estimation using sexually dimorphic amelogenin protein fragments in human enamel
Parker, G. J., Yip, J. M., Eerkens, J. W., Salemi, M., Durbin-Johnson, B., Kiesow, C., Haas, R., Buikstra, J. E., Klaus, H., Regan, L. A., et al. (2019) · Journal of Archaeological Science · doi:10.1016/j.jas.2018.08.011 · Cited by 138
Glutamine deamidation: an indicator of antiquity, or preservational quality?
Schroeter, E. R., & Cleland, T. P. (2016) · Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry · doi:10.1002/rcm.7445 · Cited by 118
Metadata
- Authors
- Robinson, N. E.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2002-04-16
- Volume
- 99
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 5283-5288
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2577842378
- Cited by
- 267
- References
- 19
- FWCI
- 3.89
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Protein deamidation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.082102799
- The paper
- Robinson, N. E. (2002). Protein deamidation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.082102799
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
