The DOI matches its Crossref record; 30 of the 30 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Coping with crowds: Density-dependent disease resistance in desert locusts
Open accessAbstract
Parasite transmission generally exhibits some form of positive density dependence. Thus, as population density increases, so too does the per capita risk of becoming infected. Under such circumstances, natural selection should favor individuals that use cues associated with population density to determine the optimal allocation of resources to disease resistance mechanisms. As a consequence, individuals experiencing crowded conditions are predicted to be more resistant to parasites and pathogens than those experiencing low-density conditions. This phenomenon (termed “density-dependent prophylaxis”) [Wilson, K. & Reeson, A. F. (1998)Ecol. Entomol.23, 100–101] is predicted to be particularly prevalent in outbreak pest species and in species exhibiting density-dependent phase polyphenism, such as the desert locust,Schistocerca gregaria. Here we show that, as predicted, desert locusts reared under crowded conditions are significantly more resistant than solitary locusts to the entomopathogenic fungus,Metarhizium anisopliae var.acridum, a key natural disease of acridids and an important agent in locust and grasshopper biocontrol. Moreover, enhanced pathogen resistance in crowded locusts is associated with elevated antimicrobial activity, but not with any difference in thermal preferences or behavioral fever response. These results have implications for understanding the development and biocontrol of locust plagues.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Molecular cloning: A laboratory manual
Deininger, P. (1990) · Analytical Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/0003-2697(90)90595-z · Cited by 84,682
Regression Models and Life-Tables
Cox, D. R. (1972) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology · doi:10.1111/j.2517-6161.1972.tb00899.x · Cited by 39,793
Cox, D. R., & Oakes, D. (2018) · Chapman & Hall/CRC eBooks · doi:10.1201/9781315137438 · Cited by 6,234
Breslow, N., Cox, D. R., & Oakes, D. (1985) · Biometrics · doi:10.2307/2530888 · Cited by 4,333
Population biology of infectious diseases: Part I
Anderson, R. M., & May, R. M. (1979) · Nature · doi:10.1038/280361a0 · Cited by 3,185
The population dynamics of microparasites and their invertebrate hosts
Anderson, R. M., & May, R. M. (1981) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. B, Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.1981.0005 · Cited by 1,173
Trade-off between parasitoid resistance and larval competitive ability in Drosophila melanogaster
Kraaijeveld, A. R., & Godfray, H. C. J. (1997) · Nature · doi:10.1038/38483 · Cited by 711
B IOLOGICAL C ONTROL OF L OCUSTS AND G RASSHOPPERS
Lomer, C. J., Bateman, R. P., Johnson, D. L., Langewald, J., & Thomas, M. B. (2001) · Annual Review of Entomology · doi:10.1146/annurev.ento.46.1.667 · Cited by 615
Self-citationMelanism and disease resistance in insects
Wilson, K., Cotter, S. C., Reeson, A. F., & Pell, J. K. (2001) · Ecology Letters · doi:10.1046/j.1461-0248.2001.00279.x · Cited by 430
Self-citationMelanogenesis and the Generation of Cytotoxic Molecules During Insect Cellular Immune Reactions
NAPPI, A. J., & VASS, E. (1993) · Pigment Cell Research · doi:10.1111/j.1600-0749.1993.tb00590.x · Cited by 346
Cited by
Cremer, S., Armitage, S. A. O., & Schmid-Hempel, P. (2007) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/j.cub.2007.06.008 · Cited by 989
Variation in immune defence as a question of evolutionary ecology
Schmid-Hempel, P. (2003) · Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspb.2002.2265 · Cited by 722
Locust Phase Polyphenism: An Update
Pener, M. P., & Simpson, S. J. (2009) · Advances in Insect Physiology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2806(08)36001-9 · Cited by 481
Self-citationMigration: The Biology of Life on the Move
Dingle, H. (2014) · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199640386.001.0001 · Cited by 455
Simpson, S. J., Sword, G. A., & Lo, N. (2011) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/j.cub.2011.06.006 · Cited by 381
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Wilson, K., Thomas, M. B., Blanford, S., Doggett, M., Simpson, S. J., & Moore, S. L.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2002-04-16
- Volume
- 99
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 5471-5475
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2155118103
- Cited by
- 384
- References
- 30
- FWCI
- 5.95
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Coping with crowds: Density-dependent disease resistance in desert locusts. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.082461999
- The paper
- Wilson, K., Thomas, M. B., Blanford, S., Doggett, M., Simpson, S. J., & Moore, S. L. (2002). Coping with crowds: Density-dependent disease resistance in desert locusts. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.082461999
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.