Cited by 294Memory and Neural MechanismsCannabis and Cannabinoid ResearchMemory Processes and Influences

Endocannabinoids in the rat basolateral amygdala enhance memory consolidation and enable glucocorticoid modulation of memory

Open access
Campolongo, Patrizia, Roozendaal, Benno, Trezza, Viviana, Hauer, Daniela, Schelling, Gustav, McGaugh, James L., Cuomo, Vincenzo·2009·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Extensive evidence indicates that the basolateral complex of the amygdala (BLA) modulates the consolidation of memories for emotionally arousing experiences, an effect that involves the activation of the glucocorticoid system. Because the BLA expresses high densities of cannabinoid CB1 receptors, the present experiments investigated whether the endocannabinoid system in the BLA influences memory consolidation and whether glucocorticoids interact with this system. The CB1 receptor agonist WIN55,212-2 (5–50 ng per 0.2 μL per side), infused bilaterally into the BLA of male Sprague–Dawley rats immediately after inhibitory avoidance training, induced dose-dependent enhancement of 48-h retention. Conversely, the CB1 receptor antagonist AM251 (0.07–0.28 ng per 0.2 μL per side) administered after training into the BLA induced inhibitory avoidance retention impairment. Furthermore, intra-BLA infusions of a low and nonimpairing dose of AM251 (0.14 ng per 0.2 μL per side) blocked the memory enhancement induced by concurrent administration of WIN55,212-2. Delayed infusions of WIN55,212-2 or AM251 administered into the BLA 3 h after training or immediate posttraining infusions of these drugs into the adjacent central amygdala did not significantly alter retention performance. Last, intra-BLA infusions of a low and otherwise nonimpairing dose of AM251 (0.14 ng per 0.2 μL per side) blocked the memory-enhancing effect induced by systemic administration of corticosterone (3 mg/kg, s.c.). These findings indicate that endocannabinoids in the BLA enhance memory consolidation and suggest that CB1 activity within this brain region is required for enabling glucocorticoid effects on memory consolidation enhancement.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.0900835106

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 65 · Cited by 294

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [34]Robinson L, et al. Hippocampal endocannabinoids inhibit spatial learning and limit spatial memory in rats. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 2007;198:551–563. doi: 10.1007/s00213-007-1012-8. [[DOI](https://doi.org/10.1007/s00213-007-1012-8)] [[PubMed](https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18049812/)] [[Google Scholar](https://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup?journal=Psychopharmacology%20(Berl)&title=Hippocampal%20endocannabinoids%20inhibit%20spatial%20learning%20and%20limit%20spatial%20memory%20in%20rats&author=L%20Robinson&volume=198&publication_year=2007&pages=551-563&pmid=18049812&doi=10.1007/s00213-007-1012-8&)] · DOI

Authors
Campolongo, P., Roozendaal, B., Trezza, V., Hauer, D., Schelling, G., McGaugh, J. L., & Cuomo, V.
Affiliations
  • Sapienza University of Rome (IT)
  • University Medical Center Groningen (NL)
  • Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (DE)
  • University of California, Irvine (US)
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2009-03-24
Volume
106
Issue
12
Pages
4888-4893
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W1974214885
Cited by
294
References
65
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 20 · 2014: 26 · 2013: 34 · 2012: 26
FWCI
13.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (publishedVersion)
  • IRIS Research product catalog (Sapienza University of Rome) (submittedVersion)
  • Iris (Roma Tre University) (submittedVersion)
  • University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
Keywords
endocannabinoids, basolateral amygdala, memory consolidation, CB1 receptor, WIN 55,212-2, AM251, glucocorticoids, corticosterone, passive avoidance, emotional memory, central amygdala, CB1 receptor antagonism
MeSH terms
Amygdala, Animals, Avoidance Learning, Corticosterone, Male, Memory, Morpholines, Naphthalenes, Piperidines, Pyrazoles, Rats, Sprague-Dawley, Receptor, Cannabinoid, CB1, Benzoxazines, Rats, Cannabinoid Receptor Modulators, Endocannabinoids

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review