The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Phylogenetic structure in tropical hummingbird communities
Open accessAbstract
How biotic interactions, current and historical environment, and biogeographic barriers determine community structure is a fundamental question in ecology and evolution, especially in diverse tropical regions. To evaluate patterns of local and regional diversity, we quantified the phylogenetic composition of 189 hummingbird communities in Ecuador. We assessed how species and phylogenetic composition changed along environmental gradients and across biogeographic barriers. We show that humid, low-elevation communities are phylogenetically overdispersed (coexistence of distant relatives), a pattern that is consistent with the idea that competition influences the local composition of hummingbirds. At higher elevations communities are phylogenetically clustered (coexistence of close relatives), consistent with the expectation of environmental filtering, which may result from the challenge of sustaining an expensive means of locomotion at high elevations. We found that communities in the lowlands on opposite sides of the Andes tend to be phylogenetically similar despite their large differences in species composition, a pattern implicating the Andes as an important dispersal barrier. In contrast, along the steep environmental gradient between the lowlands and the Andes we found evidence that species turnover is comprised of relatively distantly related species. The integration of local and regional patterns of diversity across environmental gradients and biogeographic barriers provides insight into the potential underlying mechanisms that have shaped community composition and phylogenetic diversity in one of the most species-rich, complex regions of the world.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
UniFrac: a New Phylogenetic Method for Comparing Microbial Communities
Lozupone, C., & Knight, R. (2005) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.71.12.8228-8235.2005 · Cited by 8,227
A nonparametric approach to estimating divergence times in the absence of rate constancy.
Sanderson, M. J. (1997) · Molecular Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a025731 · Cited by 1,156 · cited 1×
“To produce the ultrametric tree needed for community structure analyses, we transformed the Bayesian consensus topology by using nonparametric rate smoothing (49) implemented in the program TreeEdit version 1.”
Method
Cited by
Hutchinson's duality: The once and future niche
Colwell, R. K., & Rangel, T. F. (2009) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0901650106 · Cited by 769
Community assembly, functional traits, and phylogeny in Himalayan river birds
Sinha, A., Chatterjee, N., Krishnamurthy, R., & Ormerod, S. J. (2022) · Ecology and Evolution · doi:10.1002/ece3.9012 · Cited by 21
“The rationale behind this was that environmental filtering would lead to a decrease in trait range or variance in communities (e.g., Graham et al., 2009; Zhang et al., 2020).”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- Graham, C. H., Parra, J. L., Rahbek, C., & McGuire, J. A.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2009-11-17
- Volume
- 106
- Issue
- supplement_2
- Pages
- 19673-19678
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2043968569
- Cited by
- 440
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 13.68
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Phylogenetic structure in tropical hummingbird communities. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.0901649106
- The paper
- Graham, C. H., Parra, J. L., Rahbek, C., & McGuire, J. A. (2009). Phylogenetic structure in tropical hummingbird communities. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0901649106
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.