Cited by 769Species Distribution and Climate ChangeEcology and Vegetation Dynamics StudiesBotany and Plant Ecology Studies

Hutchinson's duality: The once and future niche

Open access
Colwell, Robert K., Rangel, Thiago F.·2009·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

The duality between “niche” and “biotope” proposed by G. Evelyn Hutchinson provides a powerful way to conceptualize and analyze biogeographical distributions in relation to spatial environmental patterns. Both Joseph Grinnell and Charles Elton had attributed niches to environments. Attributing niches, instead, to species, allowed Hutchinson's key innovation: the formal severing of physical place from environment that is expressed by the duality. In biogeography, the physical world (a spatial extension of what Hutchinson called the biotope) is conceived as a map, each point (or cell) of which is characterized by its geographical coordinates and the local values of n environmental attributes at a given time. Exactly the same n environmental attributes define the corresponding niche space, as niche axes, allowing reciprocal projections between the geographic distribution of a species, actual or potential, past or future, and its niche. In biogeographical terms, the realized niche has come to express not only the effects of species interactions (as Hutchinson intended), but also constraints of dispersal limitation and the lack of contemporary environments corresponding to parts of the fundamental niche. Hutchinson's duality has been used to classify and map environments; model potential species distributions under past, present, and future climates; study the distributions of invasive species; discover new species; and simulate increasingly more realistic worlds, leading to spatially explicit, stochastic models that encompass speciation, extinction, range expansion, and evolutionary adaptation to changing environments.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.0901650106

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Species-specific thresholds to environmental gradients are influenced by organismal traits and the magnitude of changes.

    “Species‐specific thresholds to environmental gradients are influenced by organismal traits and the magnitude of changes (Baker & King, 2010; Colwell & Rangel, 2009; Swift & Hannon, 2010; Turner, 1989).”

    From Threshold responses of floating meadow fish communities to floodplain forest cover in the lower Amazon River (2025) · cites this paper as Colwell & Rangel, 2009

    In “Hutchinson’s Duality in Dynamic, Biogeographical Simulations” (page not provided), the paper says species’ environmental tolerances and gradient strength affect their geographic ranges. It also discusses species-specific heat-tolerance limits in “Niche Adaptation vs. Niche Conservatism in a Changing Climate” (page not provided). These passages support a related idea, but do not establish that organismal traits and the magnitude of environmental changes determine species-specific thresholds. (LLM, conf=0.79)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 12

  1. Hutchinson GE (1978) An Introduction to Population Biology (Yale Univ Press, New Haven, CT).
  2. Colwell RK (1992) in Keywords in Evolutionary Biology, eds Keller EF, Lloyd EA (Harvard Univ Press, Cambridge, MA), pp 241-248.
  3. Griesemer J (1992) in Keywords in Evolutionary Biology, eds Keller EF, Lloyd EA (Harvard Univ Press, Cambridge, MA), pp 231-240.
  4. Chase J, Leibold M (2003) Ecological Niches: Linking Classical and Contemporary Approaches (Univ Chicago Press, Chicago).
  5. Grinnell J, Storer TI (1924) Animal Life in the Yosemite: An Account of the Mammals, Birds, Reptiles, and Amphibians in a Cross-Section of the Sierra Nevada (Univ California Press, Berkeley).
  6. Schaefer H, Wolff M (1999) Topological Vector Spaces (Springer, New York).
  7. Hutchinson GE (1967) A Treatise on Limnology: Introduction to Lake Biology and the Limnoplankton (Wiley, New York), Vol 2.
  8. Arau ´jo M, Pearson R (2005) Equilibrium of species' distributions with climate. Ecogra- phy 28:693-695.
  9. Pearson RG, Dawson TP (2003) Predicting the impacts of climate change on the distribution of species: Are bioclimate envelope models useful? Glob Ecol Biogeogr 12:361-371.
  10. Bush MB, Hooghiemstra H (2005) in Climate Change and Biodiversity, eds Lovejoy TE, Hannah L (Yale Univ Press, New Haven, CT), pp 151-163.
  11. Feeley KJ, Silman MR (2009) Biotic attrition from the hot tropics correcting for trun- cated temperature niches. Glob Change Biol, in press.
  12. Tilman D (1982) Resource Competition and Community Structure (Princeton Univ Press, Princeton).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Colwell, R. K., & Rangel, T. F.
Affiliations
University of Connecticut (US)
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2009-11-17
Volume
106
Issue
supplement_2
Pages
19651-19658
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2080381418
Cited by
769
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 46 · 2025: 60 · 2024: 66 · 2023: 82 · 2022: 46 · 2021: 63 · 2020: 44 · 2019: 71 · 2018: 34 · 2017: 41 · 2016: 41 · 2015: 37 · 2014: 27 · 2013: 26 · 2012: 34
FWCI
0.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (0851245, 0639979)
  • University of Connecticut
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecological Modeling › Species Distribution and Climate Change
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Botany and Plant Ecology Studies
Keywords
niche, biotope, realized niche, fundamental niche, species distribution, biogeography, environmental characteristics, niche space, dispersal limitation, species interactions, potential species distribution, climate change, invasive species, range expansion, spatially explicit model, speciation and extinction
MeSH terms
Models, Biological, Ecosystem

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review