The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Epidemiological benefits of more-effective tuberculosis vaccines, drugs, and diagnostics
Open accessAbstract
The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation supports an ambitious portfolio of novel vaccines, drug regimens, and diagnostic tools for tuberculosis (TB). We elicited the expected efficacies and improvements of the novel interventions in discussions with the foundations managing their development. Using an age-structured mathematical model of TB, we explored the potential benefits of novel interventions under development and those not yet in the portfolio, focusing on the WHO Southeast Asia region. Neonatal vaccination with the portfolio vaccine decreases TB incidence by 39% to 52% by 2050. Drug regimens that shorten treatment duration and are efficacious against drug-resistant strains reduce incidence by 10–27%. New diagnostics reduce incidence by 13–42%. A triple combination of a portfolio vaccine, drug regimen, and diagnostics reduces incidence by 71%. A short mass vaccination catch-up campaign, not yet in the portfolio, to augment the triple combination, accelerates the decrease, preventing >30% more cases by 2050 than just the triple combination. New vaccines and drug regimens targeted at the vast reservoir of latently infected people, not in the portfolio, would reduce incidence by 37% and 82%, respectively. The combination of preventive latent therapy and a 2-month drug treatment regimen reduces incidence by 94%. Novel technologies in the pipeline would achieve substantial reductions in TB incidence, but not the Stop TB Partnership target for elimination. Elimination will require new delivery strategies, such as mass vaccination campaigns, and new products targeted at latently infected people.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The Global Burden of Latent Tuberculosis Infection: A Re-estimation Using Mathematical Modelling
Houben, R. M. G. J., & Dodd, P. J. (2016) · PLOS Medicine · doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1002152 · Cited by 2,054
Lewinsohn, D. M., Leonard, M. K., LoBue, P. A., Cohn, D. L., Daley, C. L., Desmond, E., Keane, J., Lewinsohn, D. A., Loeffler, A. M., Mazurek, G. H., et al. (2017) · Clinical Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1093/cid/ciw694 · Cited by 992
“As described by Abu-Raddad et al [241], improved detection of those with TB and improved identification of those at risk to progress once infected have the potential to substantially decrease the prevalence of TB and its associated mortality.”
MethodDiacon, A. H., Dawson, R., von Groote-Bidlingmaier, F., Symons, G., Venter, A., Donald, P. R., van Niekerk, C., Everitt, D., Winter, H., Becker, P., et al. (2012) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(12)61080-0 · Cited by 435
What We Know About Tuberculosis Transmission: An Overview
Churchyard, G., Kim, P., Shah, N. S., Rustomjee, R., Gandhi, N., Mathema, B., Dowdy, D., Kasmar, A., & Cardenas, V. (2017) · The Journal of Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1093/infdis/jix362 · Cited by 341
Kaufmann, S. H., Hussey, G., & Lambert, P.-H. (2010) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(10)60393-5 · Cited by 299
Metadata
- Authors
- Abu-Raddad, L. J., Sabatelli, L., Achterberg, J. T., Sugimoto, J. D., Longini, I. M., Dye, C., & Halloran, M. E.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2009-08-18
- Volume
- 106
- Issue
- 33
- Pages
- 13980-13985
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2047509792
- Cited by
- 348
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 16.75
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Epidemiological benefits of more-effective tuberculosis vaccines, drugs, and diagnostics. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.0901720106
- The paper
- Abu-Raddad, L. J., Sabatelli, L., Achterberg, J. T., Sugimoto, J. D., Longini, I. M., Dye, C., & Halloran, M. E. (2009). Epidemiological benefits of more-effective tuberculosis vaccines, drugs, and diagnostics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0901720106
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.