The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A realistic molecular model of cement hydrates
Open accessAbstract
Despite decades of studies of calcium-silicate-hydrate (C-S-H), the structurally complex binder phase of concrete, the interplay between chemical composition and density remains essentially unexplored. Together these characteristics of C-S-H define and modulate the physical and mechanical properties of this “liquid stone” gel phase. With the recent determination of the calcium/silicon (C/S = 1.7) ratio and the density of the C-S-H particle (2.6 g/cm 3) by neutron scattering measurements, there is new urgency to the challenge of explaining these essential properties. Here we propose a molecular model of C-S-H based on a bottom-up atomistic simulation approach that considers only the chemical specificity of the system as the overriding constraint. By allowing for short silica chains distributed as monomers, dimers, and pentamers, this C-S-H archetype of a molecular description of interacting CaO, SiO 2, and H 2 O units provides not only realistic values of the C/S ratio and the density computed by grand canonical Monte Carlo simulation of water adsorption at 300 K. The model, with a chemical composition of (CaO)1.65(SiO 2)(H 2 O)1.75, also predicts other essential structural features and fundamental physical properties amenable to experimental validation, which suggest that the C-S-H gel structure includes both glass-like short-range order and crystalline features of the mineral tobermorite. Additionally, we probe the mechanical stiffness, strength, and hydrolytic shear response of our molecular model, as compared to experimentally measured properties of C-S-H. The latter results illustrate the prospect of treating cement on equal footing with metals and ceramics in the current application of mechanism-based models and multiscale simulations to study inelastic deformation and cracking.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Nanoparticle decoration with surfactants: Molecular interactions, assembly, and applications
Heinz, H., Pramanik, C., Heinz, O., Ding, Y., Mishra, R. K., Marchon, D., Flatt, R. J., Estrela-Lopis, I., Llop, J., Moya, S., et al. (2017) · Surface Science Reports · doi:10.1016/j.surfrep.2017.02.001 · Cited by 608
Calcium silicate hydrates: Solid and liquid phase composition
Lothenbach, B., & Nonat, A. (2015) · Cement and Concrete Research · doi:10.1016/j.cemconres.2015.03.019 · Cited by 538
Nanotechnology: Advantages and drawbacks in the field of construction and building materials
Pacheco-Torgal, F., & Jalali, S. (2011) · Construction and Building Materials · doi:10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2010.07.009 · Cited by 528
Parveen, S., Rana, S., & Fangueiro, R. (2013) · Journal of Nanomaterials · doi:10.1155/2013/710175 · Cited by 473
Chen, J. J., Sorelli, L., Vandamme, M., Ulm, F., & Chanvillard, G. (2010) · Journal of the American Ceramic Society · doi:10.1111/j.1551-2916.2009.03599.x · Cited by 369
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Pellenq, R. J.-M., Kushima, A., Shahsavari, R., Van Vliet, K. J., Buehler, M. J., Yip, S., & Ulm, F.-J.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2009-09-22
- Volume
- 106
- Issue
- 38
- Pages
- 16102-16107
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2158263181
- Cited by
- 1,088
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 97.36
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A realistic molecular model of cement hydrates. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.0902180106
- The paper
- Pellenq, R. J.-M., Kushima, A., Shahsavari, R., Van Vliet, K. J., Buehler, M. J., Yip, S., & Ulm, F.-J. (2009). A realistic molecular model of cement hydrates. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0902180106
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.