Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 758

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The genomic basis of trophic strategy in marine bacteria

Open access
Lauro, Federico M., McDougald, Diane, Thomas, Torsten, Williams, Timothy J., Egan, Suhelen, Rice, Scott, DeMaere, Matthew Z., Ting, Lily, Ertan, Haluk, Johnson, Justin, Ferriera, Steven, Lapidus, Alla, Anderson, Iain, Kyrpides, Nikos, Munk, A. Christine, Detter, Chris, Han, Cliff S., Brown, Mark V., Robb, Frank T., Kjelleberg, Staffan, Cavicchioli, Ricardo·2009·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Many marine bacteria have evolved to grow optimally at either high (copiotrophic) or low (oligotrophic) nutrient concentrations, enabling different species to colonize distinct trophic habitats in the oceans. Here, we compare the genome sequences of two bacteria, Photobacterium angustum S14 and Sphingopyxis alaskensis RB2256, that serve as useful model organisms for copiotrophic and oligotrophic modes of life and specifically relate the genomic features to trophic strategy for these organisms and define their molecular mechanisms of adaptation. We developed a model for predicting trophic lifestyle from genome sequence data and tested >400,000 proteins representing >500 million nucleotides of sequence data from 126 genome sequences with metagenome data of whole environmental samples. When applied to available oceanic metagenome data (e.g., the Global Ocean Survey data) the model demonstrated that oligotrophs, and not the more readily isolatable copiotrophs, dominate the ocean's free-living microbial populations. Using our model, it is now possible to define the types of bacteria that specific ocean niches are capable of sustaining.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.0903507106

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

  • Prokaryotes: The unseen majority

    Whitman, W. B., Coleman, D. C., & Wiebe, W. J. (1998) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.95.12.6578 · Cited by 4,871 · cited 1×

    “Within this environment, marine bacteria (and archaea) play a pivotal role in biogeochemical cycles while constantly assimilating, storing, transforming, exporting, and remineralizing the largest pool of organic carbon on the planet (1).”
    Background

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 758

Metadata

Authors
Lauro, F. M., McDougald, D., Thomas, T., Williams, T. J., Egan, S., Rice, S., DeMaere, M. Z., Ting, L., Ertan, H., Johnson, J., Ferriera, S., Lapidus, A., Anderson, I., Kyrpides, N., Munk, A. C., Detter, C., Han, C. S., Brown, M. V., Robb, F. T., Kjelleberg, S., & Cavicchioli, R.
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2009-09-15
Volume
106
Issue
37
Pages
15527-15533
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2123016662
Cited by
758
References
1
FWCI
26.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The genomic basis of trophic strategy in marine bacteria. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.0903507106
The paper
Lauro, F. M., McDougald, D., Thomas, T., Williams, T. J., Egan, S., Rice, S., DeMaere, M. Z., Ting, L., Ertan, H., Johnson, J., Ferriera, S., Lapidus, A., Anderson, I., Kyrpides, N., Munk, A. C., Detter, C., Han, C. S., Brown, M. V., Robb, F. T., . . . Cavicchioli, R. (2009). The genomic basis of trophic strategy in marine bacteria. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0903507106

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.