Genomic code for Sox10 activation reveals a key regulatory enhancer for cranial neural crest
Open accessAbstract
The neural crest is a multipotent, stem cell-like population that migrates extensively in the embryo and forms a wide array of derivatives, ranging from neurons to melanocytes and cartilage. Analyses of the gene regulatory network driving neural crest development revealed Sox10 as one of the earliest neural crest-specifying genes, cell-autonomously driving delamination and directly regulating numerous downstream effectors and differentiation gene batteries. In search of direct inputs to the neural crest specifier module, we dissected the chick Sox10 genomic region and isolated two downstream regulatory regions with distinct spatiotemporal activity. A unique element, Sox10E2 represents the earliest-acting neural crest cis -regulatory element, critical for initiating Sox10 expression in newly formed cranial, but not vagal and trunk neural crest. A second element, Sox10E1, acts in later migrating vagal and trunk crest cells. Deep characterization of Sox10E2 reveals Sox9, Ets1, and cMyb as direct inputs mediating enhancer activity. ChIP, DNA-pull down, and gel-shift assays demonstrate their direct binding to the Sox10E2 enhancer in vivo, whereas mutation of their corresponding binding sites, or inactivation of the three upstream regulators, abolishes both reporter and endogenous Sox10 expression. Using cis -regulatory analysis as a tool, our study makes critical connections within the neural crest gene regulatory network, thus being unique in establishing a direct link of upstream effectors to a key neural crest specifier.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Our data support the above finding, showing that transcriptional regulation of tfec via Tfap2 transcription factors is independent of them first activating sox10 or sox9b.
“Our data support the above finding, showing that transcriptional regulation of tfec via Tfap2 transcription factors is independent of them first activating sox10 or sox9b [49–51] (Fig 9B).”
From The MITF paralog tfec is required in neural crest development for fate specification of the iridophore lineage from a multipotent pigment cell progenitor (2021) · cites this paper as [51]
The Results and Discussion passages describe Sox9, Ets1, and cMyb regulating Sox10 through the Sox10E2 enhancer. Searches for tfec, Tfap2, and regulation independent of Sox9 or Sox10 found no passage addressing the claimed Tfap2-to-tfec pathway. Page numbers were not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.74)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- [17]Haldin CE, Labonne C (2009) SoxE factors as multifunctional neural crest regulatory factors. Int J Biochem Cell Biol , in press.
- [25]Wilkinson DG (1992) Whole mount in situ hybridisation of vertebrate embryos. In situ Hybridization: A Practical Approach , ed Wilkinson DG (IRL Press, Oxford), pp 75 -83.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Establishing neural crest identity: a gene regulatory recipe
Simões-Costa, M., & Bronner, M. E. (2015) · Development · doi:10.1242/dev.105445 · Cited by 649 · see citing works
Petratou, K., Spencer, S. A., Kelsh, R. N., & Lister, J. A. (2021) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0244794 · Cited by 55 · see citing works
- Authors
- Betancur, P., Bronner-Fraser, M., & Sauka-Spengler, T.
- Affiliations
- California Institute of Technology (US)
- Division of Biology 139-74, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, 91125
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Publisher
- National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2010-02-23
- Volume
- 107
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 3570-3575
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- PMC
- PMC2840498
- OpenAlex
- W2025034960
- Cited by
- 204
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 14 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 17
- FWCI
- 4.37
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- CaltechAUTHORS (California Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health (5p01hd037105-20)
- National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (R37NS036585, R01NS036585, NS 36585)
- Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (P01-HD037105)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Developmental Biology and Gene Regulation
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Developmental Neuroscience › Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms
- Keywords
- SOX10, cranial neural crest, neural crest development, cis-regulatory elements, enhancers, SOX9, ETS1, MYB, transcription factor binding sites, neural crest delamination, vagal neural crest, chick embryo, gene regulatory networks
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Base Sequence, Chick Embryo, Enhancer Elements, Genetic, Humans, Molecular Sequence Data, Neural Crest, Skull, Xenopus, Transcriptional Activation, Conserved Sequence, Gene Expression Regulation, Developmental, Genomics, Multipotent Stem Cells, Mice, Rats, Gene Regulatory Networks, SOXB1 Transcription Factors
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review