The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Design and analysis of synthetic carbon fixation pathways
Open accessAbstract
Carbon fixation is the process by which CO 2 is incorporated into organic compounds. In modern agriculture in which water, light, and nutrients can be abundant, carbon fixation could become a significant growth-limiting factor. Hence, increasing the fixation rate is of major importance in the road toward sustainability in food and energy production. There have been recent attempts to improve the rate and specificity of Rubisco, the carboxylating enzyme operating in the Calvin–Benson cycle; however, they have achieved only limited success. Nature employs several alternative carbon fixation pathways, which prompted us to ask whether more efficient novel synthetic cycles could be devised. Using the entire repertoire of approximately 5,000 metabolic enzymes known to occur in nature, we computationally identified alternative carbon fixation pathways that combine existing metabolic building blocks from various organisms. We compared the natural and synthetic pathways based on physicochemical criteria that include kinetics, energetics, and topology. Our study suggests that some of the proposed synthetic pathways could have significant quantitative advantages over their natural counterparts, such as the overall kinetic rate. One such cycle, which is predicted to be two to three times faster than the Calvin–Benson cycle, employs the most effective carboxylating enzyme, phosphoenolpyruvate carboxylase, using the core of the naturally evolved C4 cycle. Although implementing such alternative cycles presents daunting challenges related to expression levels, activity, stability, localization, and regulation, we believe our findings suggest exciting avenues of exploration in the grand challenge of enhancing food and renewable fuel production via metabolic engineering and synthetic biology.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Energy conservation in chemotrophic anaerobic bacteria
Thauer, R. K., Jungermann, K., & Decker, K. (1977) · Bacteriological Reviews · doi:10.1128/br.41.1.100-180.1977 · Cited by 4,146
Climate and the efficiency of crop production in Britain
Monteith, J. L. (1977) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. B, Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.1977.0140 · Cited by 3,484 · cited 1×
“Although some studies have found a correlation betweendrymatter productionand intercepted radiation (40), numerousother studies have shown that, under a wide range of ambient conditions, the plant cells are lightsaturated (41–43), and hence ATP and NADPH costs are thought not to be a limiting factor.”
BackgroundTowards an understanding of photosynthetic acclimation
Walters, R. G. (2004) · Journal of Experimental Botany · doi:10.1093/jxb/eri060 · Cited by 630
Pyruvate Ferredoxin Oxidoreductase and Its Radical Intermediate
Ragsdale, S. W. (2003) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr020423e · Cited by 259
Cited by
Comparing Photosynthetic and Photovoltaic Efficiencies and Recognizing the Potential for Improvement
Blankenship, R. E., Tiede, D. M., Barber, J., Brudvig, G. W., Fleming, G., Ghirardi, M., Gunner, M. R., Junge, W., Kramer, D. M., Melis, A., et al. (2011) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1200165 · Cited by 1,638
The Moderately Efficient Enzyme: Evolutionary and Physicochemical Trends Shaping Enzyme Parameters
Bar-Even, A., Noor, E., Savir, Y., Liebermeister, W., Davidi, D., Tawfik, D. S., & Milo, R. (2011) · Biochemistry · doi:10.1021/bi2002289 · Cited by 1,050
Self-citationRedesigning photosynthesis to sustainably meet global food and bioenergy demand
Ort, D. R., Merchant, S. S., Alric, J., Barkan, A., Blankenship, R. E., Bock, R., Croce, R., Hanson, M. R., Hibberd, J. M., Long, S. P., et al. (2015) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1424031112 · Cited by 1,020
Ecological Aspects of the Distribution of Different Autotrophic CO 2 Fixation Pathways
Berg, I. A. (2011) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.02473-10 · Cited by 821
Constraining the metabolic genotype–phenotype relationship using a phylogeny of in silico methods
Lewis, N. E., Nagarajan, H., & Palsson, B. O. (2012) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/nrmicro2737 · Cited by 779
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Bar-Even, A., Noor, E., Lewis, N. E., & Milo, R.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2010-04-21
- Volume
- 107
- Issue
- 19
- Pages
- 8889-8894
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W1981673913
- Cited by
- 505
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 7.56
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Design and analysis of synthetic carbon fixation pathways. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.0907176107
- The paper
- Bar-Even, A., Noor, E., Lewis, N. E., & Milo, R. (2010). Design and analysis of synthetic carbon fixation pathways. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0907176107
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.