The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Fibronectin forms the most extensible biological fibers displaying switchable force-exposed cryptic binding sites
Open accessAbstract
Rather than maximizing toughness, as needed for silk and muscle titin fibers to withstand external impact, the much softer extracellular matrix fibers made from fibronectin (Fn) can be stretched by cell generated forces and display extraordinary extensibility. We show that Fn fibers can be extended more than 8-fold (>700% strain) before 50% of the fibers break. The Young's modulus of single fibers, given by the highly nonlinear slope of the stress-strain curve, changes orders of magnitude, up to MPa. Although many other materials plastically deform before they rupture, evidence is provided that the reversible breakage of force-bearing backbone hydrogen bonds enables the large strain. When tension is released, the nano-sized Fn domains first contract in the crowded environment of fibers within seconds into random coil conformations (molten globule states), before the force-bearing hydrogen bond networks that stabilize the domain's secondary structures are reestablished within minutes (double exponential). The exposure of cryptic binding sites on Fn type III modules increases steeply upon stretching. Thus fiber extension steadily up-regulates fiber rigidity and cryptic epitope exposure, both of which are known to differentially alter cell behavior. Finally, since stress-strain relationships cannot directly be measured in native extracellular matrix (ECM), the stress-strain curves were correlated with stretch-induced alterations of intramolecular fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET) obtained from trace amounts of Fn probes (mechanical strain sensors) that can be incorporated into native ECM. Physiological implications of the extraordinary extensibility of Fn fibers and contraction kinetics are discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Cox, T. R., & Erler, J. T. (2011) · Disease Models & Mechanisms · doi:10.1242/dmm.004077 · Cited by 1,569
The stiffness of living tissues and its implications for tissue engineering
Guimarães, C. F., Gasperini, L., Marques, A. P., & Reis, R. L. (2020) · Nature Reviews Materials · doi:10.1038/s41578-019-0169-1 · Cited by 1,515
Mechanoreciprocity in cell migration
van Helvert, S., Storm, C., & Friedl, P. (2018) · Nature Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/s41556-017-0012-0 · Cited by 587
Baker, B. M., Trappmann, B., Wang, W. Y., Sakar, M. S., Kim, I. L., Shenoy, V. B., Burdick, J. A., & Chen, C. S. (2015) · Nature Materials · doi:10.1038/nmat4444 · Cited by 556
Boudou, T., Legant, W. R., Mu, A., Borochin, M. A., Thavandiran, N., Radisic, M., Zandstra, P. W., Epstein, J. A., Margulies, K. B., & Chen, C. S. (2012) · Tissue Engineering Part A · doi:10.1089/ten.tea.2011.0341 · Cited by 413
Metadata
- Authors
- Klotzsch, E., Smith, M. L., Kubow, K. E., Muntwyler, S., Little, W. C., Beyeler, F., Gourdon, D., Nelson, B. J., & Vogel, V.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2009-10-27
- Volume
- 106
- Issue
- 43
- Pages
- 18267-18272
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2018244125
- Cited by
- 265
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 6.36
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Fibronectin forms the most extensible biological fibers displaying switchable force-exposed cryptic binding sites. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.0907518106
- The paper
- Klotzsch, E., Smith, M. L., Kubow, K. E., Muntwyler, S., Little, W. C., Beyeler, F., Gourdon, D., Nelson, B. J., & Vogel, V. (2009). Fibronectin forms the most extensible biological fibers displaying switchable force-exposed cryptic binding sites. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0907518106
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.