Cited by 580Coral and Marine Ecosystems StudiesMarine and fisheries researchCoastal and Marine Management

Decadal trends in marine reserves reveal differential rates of change in direct and indirect effects

Open access
Babcock, R. C., Shears, N. T., Alcala, A. C., Barrett, N. S., Edgar, G. J., Lafferty, K. D., McClanahan, T. R., Russ, G. R.·2010·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Decadal-scale observations of marine reserves suggest that indirect effects on taxa that occur through cascading trophic interactions take longer to develop than direct effects on target species. Combining and analyzing a unique set of long-term time series of ecologic data in and out of fisheries closures from disparate regions, we found that the time to initial detection of direct effects on target species (±SE) was 5.13 ± 1.9 years, whereas initial detection of indirect effects on other taxa, which were often trait mediated, took significantly longer (13.1 ± 2.0 years). Most target species showed initial direct effects, but their trajectories over time were highly variable. Many target species continued to increase, some leveled off, and others decreased. Decreases were due to natural fluctuations, fishing impacts from outside reserves, or indirect effects from target species at higher trophic levels. The average duration of stable periods for direct effects was 6.2 ± 1.2 years, even in studies of more than 15 years. For indirect effects, stable periods averaged 9.1 ± 1.6 years, although this was not significantly different from direct effects. Populations of directly targeted species were more stable in reserves than in fished areas, suggesting increased ecologic resilience. This is an important benefit of marine reserves with respect to their function as a tool for conservation and restoration.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.0908012107

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Restoring hydrologic connectivity in the LCRE is fundamental to completing exposure pathways, enabling restoration to affect juvenile salmon either directly or indirectly.

    “Restoring hydrologic connectivity in the LCRE is fundamental to completing exposure pathways, that is, enabling restoration to affect juvenile salmon either directly (onsite) or indirectly (offsite) (Babcock et al. 2010).”

    From Evidence‐based evaluation of the cumulative effects of ecosystem restoration (2016) · cites this paper as Babcock et al. 2010

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Babcock, R. C., Shears, N. T., Alcala, A. C., Barrett, N. S., Edgar, G. J., Lafferty, K. D., McClanahan, T. R., & Russ, G. R.
Affiliations
  • Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (AU)
  • University of California, Santa Barbara (US)
  • Silliman University (PH)
  • University of Tasmania (AU)
  • United States Geological Survey (US)
  • Wildlife Conservation Society (US)
  • James Cook University (AU)
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2010-02-22
Volume
107
Issue
43
Pages
18256-18261
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2044840718
Cited by
580
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 20 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 30 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 32 · 2020: 37 · 2019: 47 · 2018: 28 · 2017: 54 · 2016: 40 · 2015: 50 · 2014: 52 · 2013: 50 · 2012: 43
FWCI
36.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ResearchOnline at James Cook University (James Cook University) (submittedVersion)
  • eCite Digital Repository (University of Tasmania) (submittedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • ResearchSpace (University of Auckland) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Coral and Marine Ecosystems Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Marine and fisheries research
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › Coastal and Marine Management
Keywords
marine reserves, fishery closure, trophic cascades, indirect effects, direct effect, target species, long-term time series, trait-mediated interactions, population stability, ecosystem resilience, marine conservation
MeSH terms
Animals, Conservation of Natural Resources, Fishes, Marine Biology, Population Dynamics, Research, Species Specificity, Time Factors, Ecosystem, Food Chain

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review