Decadal trends in marine reserves reveal differential rates of change in direct and indirect effects
Open accessAbstract
Decadal-scale observations of marine reserves suggest that indirect effects on taxa that occur through cascading trophic interactions take longer to develop than direct effects on target species. Combining and analyzing a unique set of long-term time series of ecologic data in and out of fisheries closures from disparate regions, we found that the time to initial detection of direct effects on target species (±SE) was 5.13 ± 1.9 years, whereas initial detection of indirect effects on other taxa, which were often trait mediated, took significantly longer (13.1 ± 2.0 years). Most target species showed initial direct effects, but their trajectories over time were highly variable. Many target species continued to increase, some leveled off, and others decreased. Decreases were due to natural fluctuations, fishing impacts from outside reserves, or indirect effects from target species at higher trophic levels. The average duration of stable periods for direct effects was 6.2 ± 1.2 years, even in studies of more than 15 years. For indirect effects, stable periods averaged 9.1 ± 1.6 years, although this was not significantly different from direct effects. Populations of directly targeted species were more stable in reserves than in fished areas, suggesting increased ecologic resilience. This is an important benefit of marine reserves with respect to their function as a tool for conservation and restoration.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Restoring hydrologic connectivity in the LCRE is fundamental to completing exposure pathways, enabling restoration to affect juvenile salmon either directly or indirectly.
“Restoring hydrologic connectivity in the LCRE is fundamental to completing exposure pathways, that is, enabling restoration to affect juvenile salmon either directly (onsite) or indirectly (offsite) (Babcock et al. 2010).”
From Evidence‐based evaluation of the cumulative effects of ecosystem restoration (2016) · cites this paper as Babcock et al. 2010
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Global conservation outcomes depend on marine protected areas with five key features
Edgar, G. J., Stuart-Smith, R. D., Willis, T. J., Kininmonth, S., Baker, S. C., Banks, S., Barrett, N. S., Becerro, M. A., Bernard, A. T. F., Berkhout, J., et al. (2014) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature13022 · Cited by 1,922 · see citing works
Self-citationStatus and Solutions for the World’s Unassessed Fisheries
Costello, C., Ovando, D., Hilborn, R., Gaines, S. D., Deschenes, O., & Lester, S. E. (2012) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1223389 · Cited by 796 · see citing works
Habitat recovery and restoration in aquatic ecosystems: current progress and future challenges
Geist, J., & Hawkins, S. J. (2016) · Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems · doi:10.1002/aqc.2702 · Cited by 346 · see citing works
Colléter, M., Gascuel, D., Ecoutin, J.-M., & Tito de Morais, L. (2012) · Ecological Modelling · doi:10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2012.01.019 · Cited by 49 · see citing works
Evidence‐based evaluation of the cumulative effects of ecosystem restoration
Diefenderfer, H. L., Johnson, G. E., Thom, R. M., Buenau, K. E., Weitkamp, L. A., Woodley, C. M., Borde, A. B., & Kropp, R. K. (2016) · Ecosphere · doi:10.1002/ecs2.1242 · Cited by 49 · see citing works
No persistent behavioural effects of SCUBA diving on reef sharks
Bradley, D., Papastamatiou, Y., & Caselle, J. (2017) · Marine Ecology Progress Series · doi:10.3354/meps12053 · Cited by 32 · see citing works
- Authors
- Babcock, R. C., Shears, N. T., Alcala, A. C., Barrett, N. S., Edgar, G. J., Lafferty, K. D., McClanahan, T. R., & Russ, G. R.
- Affiliations
- Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (AU)
- University of California, Santa Barbara (US)
- Silliman University (PH)
- University of Tasmania (AU)
- United States Geological Survey (US)
- Wildlife Conservation Society (US)
- James Cook University (AU)
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Publisher
- National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2010-02-22
- Volume
- 107
- Issue
- 43
- Pages
- 18256-18261
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- PMC
- PMC2972978
- OpenAlex
- W2044840718
- Cited by
- 580
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 20 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 30 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 32 · 2020: 37 · 2019: 47 · 2018: 28 · 2017: 54 · 2016: 40 · 2015: 50 · 2014: 52 · 2013: 50 · 2012: 43
- FWCI
- 36.31
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- ResearchOnline at James Cook University (James Cook University) (submittedVersion)
- eCite Digital Repository (University of Tasmania) (submittedVersion)
- Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- ResearchSpace (University of Auckland) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Coral and Marine Ecosystems Studies
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Marine and fisheries research
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › Coastal and Marine Management
- Keywords
- marine reserves, fishery closure, trophic cascades, indirect effects, direct effect, target species, long-term time series, trait-mediated interactions, population stability, ecosystem resilience, marine conservation
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Conservation of Natural Resources, Fishes, Marine Biology, Population Dynamics, Research, Species Specificity, Time Factors, Ecosystem, Food Chain
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review