Cited by 49Marine and fisheries researchCoral and Marine Ecosystems StudiesSustainability and Ecological Systems Analysis

Modelling trophic flows in ecosystems to assess the efficiency of marine protected area (MPA), a case study on the coast of sénégal

Colléter, Mathieu, Gascuel, Didier, Ecoutin, Jean-Marc, Tito de Morais, Luis·2012·Ecological Modelling

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2012.01.019

Cites

68 of 68 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Colléter, M., Gascuel, D., Ecoutin, J.-M., & Tito de Morais, L.
Affiliations
Université Européenne de Bretagne (FR)
Corresponding author
Colléter, Mathieu
Venue
Ecological Modelling
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-05
Volume
232
Pages
1-13
ISSN
0304-3800 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2141072849
Cited by
49
References
68
Citations by year
2025: 5 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 1
FWCI
4.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Ecological Modelling (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
Funders
Agence Nationale de la Recherche
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Marine and fisheries research
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Coral and Marine Ecosystems Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Sustainability and Ecological Systems Analysis
Keywords
marine protected areas, food webs, food web dynamics, fishery closure, predator-prey interactions, biomass dynamics, estuarine ecosystems, fisheries impacts, fish behavior, Senegal coast

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review