The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Global patterns in leaf 13 C discrimination and implications for studies of past and future climate
Open accessAbstract
Fractionation of carbon isotopes by plants during CO 2 uptake and fixation (Δ leaf ) varies with environmental conditions, but quantitative patterns of Δ leaf across environmental gradients at the global scale are lacking. This impedes interpretation of variability in ancient terrestrial organic matter, which encodes climatic and ecological signals. To address this problem, we converted 3,310 published leaf δ 13 C values into mean Δ leaf values for 334 woody plant species at 105 locations (yielding 570 species-site combinations) representing a wide range of environmental conditions. Our analyses reveal a strong positive correlation between Δ leaf and mean annual precipitation (MAP; R 2 = 0.55), mirroring global trends in gross primary production and indicating stomatal constraints on leaf gas-exchange, mediated by water supply, are the dominant control of Δ leaf at large spatial scales. Independent of MAP, we show a lesser, negative effect of altitude on Δ leaf and minor effects of temperature and latitude. After accounting for these factors, mean Δ leaf of evergreen gymnosperms is lower (by 1–2.7‰) than for other woody plant functional types (PFT), likely due to greater leaf-level water-use efficiency. Together, environmental and PFT effects contribute to differences in mean Δ leaf of up to 6‰ between biomes. Coupling geologic indicators of ancient precipitation and PFT (or biome) with modern Δ leaf patterns has potential to yield more robust reconstructions of atmospheric δ 13 C values, leading to better constraints on past greenhouse-gas perturbations. Accordingly, we estimate a 4.6‰ decline in the δ 13 C of atmospheric CO 2 at the onset of the Paleocene-Eocene Thermal Maximum, an abrupt global warming event ∼55.8 Ma.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Carbon Isotope Discrimination and Photosynthesis
Farquhar, G. D., Ehleringer, J. R., & Hubick, K. T. (1989) · Annual Review of Plant Physiology and Plant Molecular Biology · doi:10.1146/annurev.pp.40.060189.002443 · Cited by 7,063
Hayes, J. M., Strauss, H., & Kaufman, A. J. (1999) · Chemical Geology · doi:10.1016/s0009-2541(99)00083-2 · Cited by 843
Cited by
ATMOSPHERIC RADIOCARBON FOR THE PERIOD 1950–2019
Hua, Q., Turnbull, J. C., Santos, G. M., Rakowski, A. Z., Ancapichún, S., De Pol-Holz, R., Hammer, S., Lehman, S. J., Levin, I., Miller, J. B., et al. (2022) · Radiocarbon · doi:10.1017/rdc.2021.95 · Cited by 458
Production of n-alkyl lipids in living plants and implications for the geologic past
Diefendorf, A. F., Freeman, K. H., Wing, S. L., & Graham, H. V. (2011) · Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta · doi:10.1016/j.gca.2011.09.028 · Cited by 340
Self-citationThe effect of atmospheric CO2 concentration on carbon isotope fractionation in C3 land plants
Schubert, B. A., & Jahren, A. H. (2012) · Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta · doi:10.1016/j.gca.2012.08.003 · Cited by 334
Metadata
- Authors
- Diefendorf, A. F., Mueller, K. E., Wing, S. L., Koch, P. L., & Freeman, K. H.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2010-03-15
- Volume
- 107
- Issue
- 13
- Pages
- 5738-5743
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W1969473919
- Cited by
- 860
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 32.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Global patterns in leaf 13 C discrimination and implications for studies of past and future climate. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.0910513107
- The paper
- Diefendorf, A. F., Mueller, K. E., Wing, S. L., Koch, P. L., & Freeman, K. H. (2010). Global patterns in leaf 13 C discrimination and implications for studies of past and future climate. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0910513107
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.