Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 263

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

High throughput sequencing reveals a complex pattern of dynamic interrelationships among human T cell subsets

Open access
Wang, Chunlin, Sanders, Catherine M., Yang, Qunying, Schroeder, Harry W., Wang, Elijah, Babrzadeh, Farbod, Gharizadeh, Baback, Myers, Richard M., Hudson, James R., Davis, Ronald W., Han, Jian·2010·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Developing T cells face a series of cell fate choices in the thymus and in the periphery. The role of the individual T cell receptor (TCR) in determining decisions of cell fate remains unresolved. The stochastic/selection model postulates that the initial fate of the cell is independent of TCR specificity, with survival dependent on additional TCR/coreceptor “rescue” signals. The “instructive” model holds that cell fate is initiated by the interaction of the TCR with a cognate peptide-MHC complex. T cells are then segregated on the basis of TCR specificity with the aid of critical coreceptors and signal modulators [Chan S, Correia-Neves M, Benoist C, Mathis (1998) Immunol Rev 165: 195–207]. The former would predict a random representation of individual TCR across divergent T cell lineages whereas the latter would predict minimal overlap between divergent T cell subsets. To address this issue, we have used high-throughput sequencing to evaluate the TCR distribution among key T cell developmental and effector subsets from a single donor. We found numerous examples of individual subsets sharing identical TCR sequence, supporting a model of a stochastic process of cell fate determination coupled with dynamic patterns of clonal expansion of T cells bearing the same TCR sequence among both CD4 + and CD8+ populations.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.0913939107

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 5 references

Cited by

See all 263

Metadata

Authors
Wang, C., Sanders, C. M., Yang, Q., Schroeder, H. W., Wang, E., Babrzadeh, F., Gharizadeh, B., Myers, R. M., Hudson, J. R., Davis, R. W., & Han, J.
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2010-01-04
Volume
107
Issue
4
Pages
1518-1523
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2041390189
Cited by
263
References
5
FWCI
7.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: High throughput sequencing reveals a complex pattern of dynamic interrelationships among human T cell subsets. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.0913939107
The paper
Wang, C., Sanders, C. M., Yang, Q., Schroeder, H. W., Wang, E., Babrzadeh, F., Gharizadeh, B., Myers, R. M., Hudson, J. R., Davis, R. W., & Han, J. (2010). High throughput sequencing reveals a complex pattern of dynamic interrelationships among human T cell subsets. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0913939107

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.