Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 190

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A ligand-reversible dimerization system for controlling protein–protein interactions

Open access
Rollins, Carl T., Rivera, Victor M., Woolfson, Derek N., Keenan, Terence, Hatada, Marcos, Adams, Susan E., Andrade, Lawrence J., Yaeger, David, van Schravendijk, Marie Rose, Holt, Dennis A., Gilman, Michael, Clackson, Tim·2000·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Chemically induced dimerization provides a general way to gain control over intracellular processes. Typically, FK506-binding protein (FKBP) domains are fused to a signaling domain of interest, allowing crosslinking to be initiated by addition of a bivalent FKBP ligand. In the course of protein engineering studies on human FKBP, we discovered that a single point mutation in the ligand-binding site (Phe-36 → Met) converts the normally monomeric protein into a ligand-reversible dimer. Two-hybrid, gel filtration, analytical ultracentrifugation, and x-ray crystallographic studies show that the mutant (F M ) forms discrete homodimers with micromolar affinity that can be completely dissociated within minutes by addition of monomeric synthetic ligands. These unexpected properties form the basis for a “reverse dimerization” regulatory system involving F M fusion proteins, in which association is the ground state and addition of ligand abolishes interactions. We have used this strategy to rapidly and reversibly aggregate fusion proteins in different cellular compartments, and to provide an off switch for transcription. Reiterated F M domains should be generally useful as conditional aggregation domains (CADs) to control intracellular events where rapid, reversible dissolution of interactions is required. Our results also suggest that dimerization is a latent property of the FKBP fold: the crystal structure reveals a remarkably complementary interaction between the monomer binding sites, with only subtle changes in side-chain disposition accounting for the dramatic change in quaternary structure.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.100101997

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 190

Metadata

Authors
Rollins, C. T., Rivera, V. M., Woolfson, D. N., Keenan, T., Hatada, M., Adams, S. E., Andrade, L. J., Yaeger, D., van Schravendijk, M. R., Holt, D. A., Gilman, M., & Clackson, T.
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2000-06-13
Volume
97
Issue
13
Pages
7096-7101
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2110221241
Cited by
190
References
2
FWCI
2.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A ligand-reversible dimerization system for controlling protein–protein interactions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.100101997
The paper
Rollins, C. T., Rivera, V. M., Woolfson, D. N., Keenan, T., Hatada, M., Adams, S. E., Andrade, L. J., Yaeger, D., van Schravendijk, M. R., Holt, D. A., Gilman, M., & Clackson, T. (2000). A ligand-reversible dimerization system for controlling protein–protein interactions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.100101997

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.