Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 450

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 31 of the 31 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Clinical response and miR-29b predictive significance in older AML patients treated with a 10-day schedule of decitabine

Open access
Blum, William, Garzon, Ramiro, Klisovic, Rebecca B., Schwind, Sebastian, Walker, Alison, Geyer, Susan, Liu, Shujun, Havelange, Violaine, Becker, Heiko, Schaaf, Larry, Mickle, Jon, Devine, Hollie, Kefauver, Cheryl, Devine, Steven M., Chan, Kenneth K., Heerema, Nyla A., Bloomfield, Clara D., Grever, Michael R., Byrd, John C., Villalona-Calero, Miguel, Croce, Carlo M., Marcucci, Guido·2010·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

A phase II clinical trial with single-agent decitabine was conducted in older patients (≥60 years) with previously untreated acute myeloid leukemia (AML) who were not candidates for or who refused intensive chemotherapy. Subjects received low-dose decitabine at 20 mg/m 2 i.v. over 1 h on days 1 to 10. Fifty-three subjects enrolled with a median age of 74 years (range, 60–85). Nineteen (36%) had antecedent hematologic disorder or therapy-related AML; 16 had complex karyotypes (≥3 abnormalities). The complete remission rate was 47% ( n = 25), achieved after a median of three cycles of therapy. Nine additional subjects had no morphologic evidence of disease with incomplete count recovery, for an overall response rate of 64% ( n = 34). Complete remission was achieved in 52% of subjects presenting with normal karyotype and in 50% of those with complex karyotypes. Median overall and disease-free survival durations were 55 and 46 weeks, respectively. Death within 30 days of initiation of treatment occurred in one subject (2%), death within 8 weeks in 15% of subjects. Given the DNA hypomethylating effect of decitabine, we examined the relationship of clinical response and pretreatment level of miR-29b , previously shown to target DNA methyltransferases. Higher levels of miR-29b were associated with clinical response ( P = 0.02). In conclusion, this schedule of decitabine was highly active and well tolerated in this poor-risk cohort of older AML patients. Levels of miR-29b should be validated as a predictive factor for stratification of older AML patients to decitabine treatment.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.1002650107

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 31 references

Cited by

See all 450

Metadata

Authors
Blum, W., Garzon, R., Klisovic, R. B., Schwind, S., Walker, A., Geyer, S., Liu, S., Havelange, V., Becker, H., Schaaf, L., Mickle, J., Devine, H., Kefauver, C., Devine, S. M., Chan, K. K., Heerema, N. A., Bloomfield, C. D., Grever, M. R., Byrd, J. C., Villalona-Calero, M., Croce, C. M., & Marcucci, G.
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2010-04-05
Volume
107
Issue
16
Pages
7473-7478
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2081391009
Cited by
450
References
31
FWCI
26.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Clinical response and miR-29b predictive significance in older AML patients treated with a 10-day schedule of decitabine. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.1002650107
The paper
Blum, W., Garzon, R., Klisovic, R. B., Schwind, S., Walker, A., Geyer, S., Liu, S., Havelange, V., Becker, H., Schaaf, L., Mickle, J., Devine, H., Kefauver, C., Devine, S. M., Chan, K. K., Heerema, N. A., Bloomfield, C. D., Grever, M. R., Byrd, J. C., . . . Marcucci, G. (2010). Clinical response and miR-29b predictive significance in older AML patients treated with a 10-day schedule of decitabine. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1002650107

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.