The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Charge-density-based analysis of the current–voltage response of polythiophene/fullerene photovoltaic devices
Open accessAbstract
A key challenge for organic electronics research is to develop device models that correctly account for the structural and energetic disorder typically present in such materials. In this paper we report an approach to analyze the electrical performance of an organic electronic device based upon charge extraction measurements of charge densities and transient optoelectronic measurements of charge carrier dynamics. This approach is applied to a poly(3-hexyl thiophene) (P3HT)/6,6 phenyl C61 butyric acid methyl ester (PCBM) blend photovoltaic device. These measurements are employed to determine the empirical rate law for bimolecular recombination losses, with the energetic disorder present in the materials being accounted for by a charge-density-dependent recombination coefficient. This rate law is then employed to simulate the current/voltage curve. This simulation assumes the only mechanism for the loss of photogenerated charges is bimolecular recombination and employs no fitting parameters. Remarkably the simulation is in good agreement with the experimental current/voltage data over a wide range of operating conditions of the solar cell. We thus demonstrate that the primary determinant of both the open-circuit voltage and fill factor of P3HT∶PCBM devices is bimolecular recombination. We go on to discuss the applicability of this analysis approach to other materials systems, and particularly to emphasize the effectiveness of this approach where the presence of disorder complicates the implementation of more conventional, voltage-based analyses such as the Shockley diode equation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
He, Z., Zhong, C., Huang, X., Wong, W., Wu, H., Chen, L., Su, S., & Cao, Y. (2011) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/adma.201103006 · Cited by 2,134
Polymer solar cells with enhanced fill factors
Guo, X., Zhou, N., Lou, S. J., Smith, J., Tice, D. B., Hennek, J. W., Ortiz, R. P., Navarrete, J. T. L., Li, S., Strzalka, J., et al. (2013) · Nature Photonics · doi:10.1038/nphoton.2013.207 · Cited by 938
Hao, F., Stoumpos, C. C., Guo, P., Zhou, N., Marks, T. J., Chang, R. P. H., & Kanatzidis, M. G. (2015) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/jacs.5b06658 · Cited by 759
Small is Powerful: Recent Progress in Solution‐Processed Small Molecule Solar Cells
Collins, S. D., Ran, N. A., Heiber, M. C., & Nguyen, T. (2017) · Advanced Energy Materials · doi:10.1002/aenm.201602242 · Cited by 414
Metadata
- Authors
- Shuttle, C. G., Hamilton, R., O’Regan, B. C., Nelson, J., & Durrant, J. R.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2010-09-07
- Volume
- 107
- Issue
- 38
- Pages
- 16448-16452
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2073466875
- Cited by
- 280
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 23.42
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Charge-density-based analysis of the current–voltage response of polythiophene/fullerene photovoltaic devices. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.1004363107
- The paper
- Shuttle, C. G., Hamilton, R., O’Regan, B. C., Nelson, J., & Durrant, J. R. (2010). Charge-density-based analysis of the current–voltage response of polythiophene/fullerene photovoltaic devices. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1004363107
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.