AMPA receptors gate spine Ca 2+ transients and spike-timing-dependent potentiation
Open accessAbstract
Spike timing-dependent long-term potentiation (t-LTP) is the embodiment of Donald Hebb's postulated rule for associative memory formation. Pre- and postsynaptic action potentials need to be precisely correlated in time to induce this form of synaptic plasticity. NMDA receptors have been proposed to detect correlated activity and to trigger synaptic plasticity. However, the slow kinetic of NMDA receptor currents is at odds with the millisecond precision of coincidence detection. Here we show that AMPA receptors are responsible for the extremely narrow time window for t-LTP induction. Furthermore, we visualized synergistic interactions between AMPA and NMDA receptors and back-propagating action potentials on the level of individual spines. Supralinear calcium signals were observed for spike timings that induced t-LTP and were most pronounced in spines well isolated from the dendrite. We conclude that AMPA receptors gate the induction of associative synaptic plasticity by regulating the temporal precision of coincidence detection.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Opening of sodium and calcium channels boosts local depolarization, while opening of potassium channels decreases local input resistance and results in smaller synaptic potentials.
“Opening of sodium and calcium channels boosts local depolarization (Araya et al., 2007; Bloodgood et al., 2009; Holbro et al., 2010; Carter et al., 2012; Hao and Oertner, 2012), while opening of potassium channels decreases local input resistance and results in smaller synaptic potentials (Ngo-Anh et al., 2005; Giessel and Sabatini, 2010).”
From Barriers in the brain: resolving dendritic spine morphology and compartmentalization (2014) · cites this paper as Holbro et al., 2010
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 42 · Cited by 45
- Authors
- Holbro, N., Grunditz, Å., Wiegert, J. S., & Oertner, T. G.
- Affiliations
- Friedrich Miescher Institute (CH)
- University of California, San Francisco (US)
- Corresponding author
- Oertner, Thomas G.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Publisher
- National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2010-08-23
- Volume
- 107
- Issue
- 36
- Pages
- 15975-15980
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- PMC
- PMC2936625
- OpenAlex
- W2065484818
- Cited by
- 45
- References
- 42
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 1.29
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Gebert Rüf Stiftung
- SystemsX.ch
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
- Keywords
- AMPA receptors, NMDA receptor, dendritic spines, calcium transients, coincidence detection, synaptic plasticity, backpropagating action potentials, Hebbian learning
- MeSH terms
- Action Potentials, Animals, Calcium, Hippocampus, Rats, Wistar, Long-Term Potentiation, Receptors, AMPA, Rats, In Vitro Techniques
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review