The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Second harmonic generating (SHG) nanoprobes for in vivo imaging
Open accessAbstract
Fluorescence microscopy has profoundly changed cell and molecular biology studies by permitting tagged gene products to be followed as they function and interact. The ability of a fluorescent dye to absorb and emit light of different wavelengths allows it to generate startling contrast that, in the best cases, can permit single molecule detection and tracking. However, in many experimental settings, fluorescent probes fall short of their potential due to dye bleaching, dye signal saturation, and tissue autofluorescence. Here, we demonstrate that second harmonic generating (SHG) nanoprobes can be used for in vivo imaging, circumventing many of the limitations of classical fluorescence probes. Under intense illumination, such as at the focus of a laser-scanning microscope, these SHG nanocrystals convert two photons into one photon of half the wavelength; thus, when imaged by conventional two-photon microscopy, SHG nanoprobes appear to generate a signal with an inverse Stokes shift like a fluorescent dye, but with a narrower emission. Unlike commonly used fluorescent probes, SHG nanoprobes neither bleach nor blink, and the signal they generate does not saturate with increasing illumination intensity. The resulting contrast and detectability of SHG nanoprobes provide unique advantages for molecular imaging of living cells and tissues.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A review of the optical properties of biological tissues
Cheong, W. F., Prahl, S. A., & Welch, A. J. (1990) · IEEE Journal of Quantum Electronics · doi:10.1109/3.64354 · Cited by 2,530
Campagnola, P. J., & Loew, L. M. (2003) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt894 · Cited by 1,326
Cited by
Upconversion Nanoparticles: Design, Nanochemistry, and Applications in Theranostics
Chen, G., Qiu, H., Prasad, P. N., & Chen, X. (2014) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr400425h · Cited by 2,699
Deep and fast live imaging with two-photon scanned light-sheet microscopy
Truong, T. V., Supatto, W., Koos, D. S., Choi, J. M., & Fraser, S. E. (2011) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/nmeth.1652 · Cited by 489
Self-citationLiu, L., Chen, B., Liu, K., Gao, J., Ye, Y., Wang, Z., Qin, N., Wilson, D. A., Tu, Y., & Peng, F. (2020) · Advanced Functional Materials · doi:10.1002/adfm.201910108 · Cited by 150
Metadata
- Authors
- Pantazis, P., Maloney, J., Wu, D., & Fraser, S. E.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2010-07-28
- Volume
- 107
- Issue
- 33
- Pages
- 14535-14540
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2046300032
- Cited by
- 338
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 11.47
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Second harmonic generating (SHG) nanoprobes for in vivo imaging. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.1004748107
- The paper
- Pantazis, P., Maloney, J., Wu, D., & Fraser, S. E. (2010). Second harmonic generating (SHG) nanoprobes for in vivo imaging. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1004748107
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.