Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 301

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Quantitative proteomics of the Cav2 channel nano-environments in the mammalian brain

Open access
Müller, Catrin Swantje, Haupt, Alexander, Bildl, Wolfgang, Schindler, Jens, Knaus, Hans-Günther, Meissner, Marcel, Rammner, Burkhard, Striessnig, Jörg, Flockerzi, Veit, Fakler, Bernd, Schulte, Uwe·2010·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Local Ca 2+ signaling occurring within nanometers of voltage-gated Ca 2+ (Cav) channels is crucial for CNS function, yet the molecular composition of Cav channel nano-environments is largely unresolved. Here, we used a proteomic strategy combining knockout-controlled multiepitope affinity purifications with high-resolution quantitative MS for comprehensive analysis of the molecular nano-environments of the Cav2 channel family in the whole rodent brain. The analysis shows that Cav2 channels, composed of pore-forming α1 and auxiliary β subunits, are embedded into protein networks that may be assembled from a pool of ∼200 proteins with distinct abundance, stability of assembly, and preference for the three Cav2 subtypes. The majority of these proteins have not previously been linked to Cav channels; about two-thirds are dedicated to the control of intracellular Ca 2+ concentration, including G protein-coupled receptor-mediated signaling, to activity-dependent cytoskeleton remodeling or Ca 2+ -dependent effector systems that comprise a high portion of the priming and release machinery of synaptic vesicles. The identified protein networks reflect the cellular processes that can be initiated by Cav2 channel activity and define the molecular framework for organization and operation of local Ca 2+ signaling by Cav2 channels in the brain.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.1005940107

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 6 references

Cited by

See all 301

Metadata

Authors
Müller, C. S., Haupt, A., Bildl, W., Schindler, J., Knaus, H.-G., Meissner, M., Rammner, B., Striessnig, J., Flockerzi, V., Fakler, B., & Schulte, U.
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2010-07-28
Volume
107
Issue
34
Pages
14950-14957
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W1970899379
Cited by
301
References
6
FWCI
8.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Quantitative proteomics of the Cav2 channel nano-environments in the mammalian brain. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.1005940107
The paper
Müller, C. S., Haupt, A., Bildl, W., Schindler, J., Knaus, H.-G., Meissner, M., Rammner, B., Striessnig, J., Flockerzi, V., Fakler, B., & Schulte, U. (2010). Quantitative proteomics of the Cav2 channel nano-environments in the mammalian brain. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1005940107

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.