Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 2,611

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Density functional theory in surface chemistry and catalysis

Open access
Nørskov, Jens K., Abild-Pedersen, Frank, Studt, Felix, Bligaard, Thomas·2011·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Recent advances in the understanding of reactivity trends for chemistry at transition-metal surfaces have enabled in silico design of heterogeneous catalysts in a few cases. The current status of the field is discussed with an emphasis on the role of coupling theory and experiment and future challenges.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.1006652108

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 4 references

Cited by

See all 2,611

Metadata

Authors
Nørskov, J. K., Abild-Pedersen, F., Studt, F., & Bligaard, T.
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2011-01-10
Volume
108
Issue
3
Pages
937-943
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W1973836541
Cited by
2,611
References
4
FWCI
31.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Density functional theory in surface chemistry and catalysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.1006652108
The paper
Nørskov, J. K., Abild-Pedersen, F., Studt, F., & Bligaard, T. (2011). Density functional theory in surface chemistry and catalysis. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1006652108

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.