Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 487

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Detection of inherited mutations for breast and ovarian cancer using genomic capture and massively parallel sequencing

Open access
Walsh, Tom, Lee, Ming K., Casadei, Silvia, Thornton, Anne M., Stray, Sunday M., Pennil, Christopher, Nord, Alex S., Mandell, Jessica B., Swisher, Elizabeth M., King, Mary-Claire·2010·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Inherited loss-of-function mutations in the tumor suppressor genes BRCA1 , BRCA2 , and multiple other genes predispose to high risks of breast and/or ovarian cancer. Cancer-associated inherited mutations in these genes are collectively quite common, but individually rare or even private. Genetic testing for BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations has become an integral part of clinical practice, but testing is generally limited to these two genes and to women with severe family histories of breast or ovarian cancer. To determine whether massively parallel, “next-generation” sequencing would enable accurate, thorough, and cost-effective identification of inherited mutations for breast and ovarian cancer, we developed a genomic assay to capture, sequence, and detect all mutations in 21 genes, including BRCA1 and BRCA2 , with inherited mutations that predispose to breast or ovarian cancer. Constitutional genomic DNA from subjects with known inherited mutations, ranging in size from 1 to >100,000 bp, was hybridized to custom oligonucleotides and then sequenced using a genome analyzer. Analysis was carried out blind to the mutation in each sample. Average coverage was >1200 reads per base pair. After filtering sequences for quality and number of reads, all single-nucleotide substitutions, small insertion and deletion mutations, and large genomic duplications and deletions were detected. There were zero false-positive calls of nonsense mutations, frameshift mutations, or genomic rearrangements for any gene in any of the test samples. This approach enables widespread genetic testing and personalized risk assessment for breast and ovarian cancer.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.1007983107

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 6 references

Cited by

See all 487

Metadata

Authors
Walsh, T., Lee, M. K., Casadei, S., Thornton, A. M., Stray, S. M., Pennil, C., Nord, A. S., Mandell, J. B., Swisher, E. M., & King, M.-C.
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2010-06-28
Volume
107
Issue
28
Pages
12629-12633
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2106542343
Cited by
487
References
6
FWCI
21.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Detection of inherited mutations for breast and ovarian cancer using genomic capture and massively parallel sequencing. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.1007983107
The paper
Walsh, T., Lee, M. K., Casadei, S., Thornton, A. M., Stray, S. M., Pennil, C., Nord, A. S., Mandell, J. B., Swisher, E. M., & King, M.-C. (2010). Detection of inherited mutations for breast and ovarian cancer using genomic capture and massively parallel sequencing. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1007983107

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.