Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 228

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 24 of the 24 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

D-peptide inhibitors of the p53–MDM2 interaction for targeted molecular therapy of malignant neoplasms

Open access
Liu, Min, Li, Chong, Pazgier, Marzena, Li, Changqing, Mao, Yubin, Lv, Yifan, Gu, Bing, Wei, Gang, Yuan, Weirong, Zhan, Changyou, Lu, Wei-Yue, Lu, Wuyuan·2010·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

The oncoproteins MDM2 and MDMX negatively regulate the activity and stability of the tumor suppressor protein p53, conferring tumor development and survival. Antagonists targeting the p53-binding domains of MDM2 and MDMX kill tumor cells both in vitro and in vivo by reactivating the p53 pathway, promising a class of antitumor agents for cancer therapy. Aided by native chemical ligation and mirror image phage display, we recently identified a D-peptide inhibitor of the p53-MDM2 interaction termed D PMI-α (TNWYANLEKLLR) that competes with p53 for MDM2 binding at an affinity of 219 nM. Increased selection stringency resulted in a distinct D-peptide inhibitor termed D PMI-γ (DWWPLAFEALLR) that binds MDM2 at an affinity of 53 nM. Structural studies coupled with mutational analysis verified the mode of action of these D-peptides as MDM2-dependent p53 activators. Despite being resistant to proteolysis, both D PMI-α and D PMI-γ failed to actively traverse the cell membrane and, when conjugated to a cationic cell-penetrating peptide, were indiscriminately cytotoxic independently of p53 status. When encapsulated in liposomes decorated with an integrin-targeting cyclic-RGD peptide, however, D PMI-α exerted potent p53-dependent growth inhibitory activity against human glioblastoma in cell cultures and nude mouse xenograft models. Our findings validate D-peptide antagonists of MDM2 as a class of p53 activators for targeted molecular therapy of malignant neoplasms harboring WT p53 and elevated levels of MDM2.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.1008930107

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 24 references

Cited by

See all 228

Metadata

Authors
Liu, M., Li, C., Pazgier, M., Li, C., Mao, Y., Lv, Y., Gu, B., Wei, G., Yuan, W., Zhan, C., Lu, W.-Y., & Lu, W.
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2010-07-26
Volume
107
Issue
32
Pages
14321-14326
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2120620959
Cited by
228
References
24
FWCI
5.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: D-peptide inhibitors of the p53–MDM2 interaction for targeted molecular therapy of malignant neoplasms. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.1008930107
The paper
Liu, M., Li, C., Pazgier, M., Li, C., Mao, Y., Lv, Y., Gu, B., Wei, G., Yuan, W., Zhan, C., Lu, W.-Y., & Lu, W. (2010). D-peptide inhibitors of the p53–MDM2 interaction for targeted molecular therapy of malignant neoplasms. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1008930107

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.