Cited by 154

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Ras-related protein Rab10 facilitates TLR4 signaling by promoting replenishment of TLR4 onto the plasma membrane

Wang, Di, Lou, Jun, Ouyang, Chuan, Chen, Weilin, Liu, Yiqi, Liu, Xinyuan, Cao, Xuetao, Wang, Jianli, Lu, Linrong·2010·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

The Toll-like receptor (TLR)4 receptor complex, TLR4/MD-2, plays an important role in the inflammatory response against lipopolysaccharide, a ubiquitous membrane component in Gram-negative bacteria. Ligand recognition by TLR4 initiates multiple intracellular signaling pathways, leading to production of proinflammatory mediators and type I IFN. Ligand interaction also leads to internalization of the surface receptor complex into lysosomes, leading to the degradation of TLR4 and the termination of LPS response. However, surface level of TLR4 receptor complex is maintained via continuous replenishment of TLR4 from intracellular compartments like Golgi and endosomes. Here we show that continuous replenishment of TLR4 from Golgi to plasma membrane is regulated by the small GTPase Rab10, which is essential for optimal macrophage activation following LPS stimulation. Expression of Rab10 is inducible by LPS. Blockade of Rab10 function leads to decreased membrane TLR4 expression and diminished production of inflammatory cytokines and interferons upon LPS stimulation. These findings suggest that Rab10 expression provides a mechanism to refine TLR4 signaling by regulating the trafficking rate of TLR4 onto the plasma membrane. In addition, we show that altered Rab10 expression in macrophages influences disease severity in an in vivo model of LPS-induced acute lung injury, suggesting Rab10 as a possible therapeutic target for human acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS).

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.1009428107

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • RAB10 has been localized to multiple subcellular compartments in different cell types including the endoplasmic reticulum, trans Golgi network, early endosomes, recycling endosomes, phagosomes, and primary cilia.

    “Consistent with this wide range of functions, RAB10 has been localized to multiple subcellular compartments in different cell types including the endoplasmic reticulum, trans Golgi network, early endosomes, recycling endosomes, phagosomes, and primary cilia (25, 31, 32, 50, 51, 52).”

    From The small GTPase RAB10 regulates endosomal recycling of the LDL receptor and transferrin receptor in hepatocytes (2022) · cites this paper as [32]

    The Results and Discussion section reports Rab10 localization in Golgi and early endosomal compartments in RAW264.7 cells, supporting the trans-Golgi-network and early-endosome portions of the claim. It does not establish localization in the endoplasmic reticulum, recycling endosomes, phagosomes, or primary cilia, or document the claimed range across different cell types. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • RAB10 has been implicated in diverse areas of membrane trafficking in different cell types, including formation of noncanonical macropinosome tubules in macrophages, vesicle transportation from early endosome to recycling endosome in C. elegans, and Golgi to plasma membrane transport in macrophages.

    “RAB10 has also been implicated in diverse areas of membrane trafficking in different cell types, including formation of noncanonical macropinosome tubules in macrophages (49), vesicle transportation from early endosome to recycling endosome in C. elegans (31), and Golgi to plasma membrane transport in macrophages (32).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 20

  1. 10.1016/j.cell.2010.01.022 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1097/00008480-200306000-00009 · DOI
  3. 10.1016/j.smim.2003.10.003 · DOI
  4. 10.1016/j.imbio.2008.11.012 · DOI
  5. 10.1084/jem.20071132 · DOI
  6. 10.4049/jimmunol.177.3.1772 · DOI
  7. 10.1042/BST0371193 · DOI
  8. 10.1111/j.1748-1716.2007.01778.x · DOI
  9. 10.1016/j.cytogfr.2005.05.008 · DOI
  10. 10.1016/j.immuni.2006.10.014 · DOI
  11. 10.1016/j.cmet.2007.03.001 · DOI · Paper page
  12. 10.1111/j.1600-0854.2006.00506.x · DOI · Paper page
  13. 10.1074/jbc.M207873200 · DOI
  14. 10.1182/blood-2007-01-066027 · DOI
  15. 10.1073/pnas.0704602104 · DOI
  16. 10.1038/nature08118 · DOI
  17. 10.1002/(SICI)1521-4141(199803)28:03<805::AID-IMMU805>3.0.CO;2-G · DOI
  18. 10.1128/MCB.21.23.7971-7980.2001 · DOI
  19. 10.1074/jbc.M706426200 · DOI
  20. 10.1182/blood-2006-11-059873 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Wang, D., Lou, J., Ouyang, C., Chen, W., Liu, Y., Liu, X., Cao, X., Wang, J., & Lu, L.
Affiliations
  • Institute of Immunology and
  • Xin Yuan Institute of Medicine and Biotechnology, Life Science College, Zhejiang Sci-Tech University, Hangzhou 310018, China; and
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2010-07-19
Volume
107
Issue
31
Pages
13806-13811
ISSN
  • 0027-8424
  • 1091-6490
Cited by
154
References
2
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review